• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 54 64 67 59 PROFICIENT 39 32 29 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 3 3 2 FAILING 1 1 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 68 66 64 69 PROFICIENT 22 24 24 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 4 9 10 FAILING 1 5 4 1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 41 34 38 PROFICIENT 65 47 49 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 13 10 16 14 FAILING 1 2 2 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 27 29 18 PROFICIENT 69 63 63 75 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 7 7 5 WARNING 3 3 2 3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 22 17 19 PROFICIENT 33 35 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 28 26 30 WARNING 16 15 19 13

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 3 2 1 PROFICIENT 41 48 45 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 39 49 42 WARNING 8 10 5 8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 16 18 14 PROFICIENT 62 66 69 70 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 14 11 15 WARNING 2 3 2 0

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 14 21 17 PROFICIENT 38 35 36 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 37 31 25 WARNING 19 14 12 15

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 24 18 17 PROFICIENT 61 60 62 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 12 18 18 WARNING 3 4 2 3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 36 35 29 PROFICIENT 36 37 42 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 19 20 17 23 WARNING 7 7 5 5

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 18 19 21 PROFICIENT 62 53 58 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 25 19 22 WARNING 4 3 4 6

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 23 33 30 PROFICIENT 42 37 42 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 30 19 22 WARNING 8 10 6 11

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 16 24 21 PROFICIENT 46 30 41 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 46 31 32 WARNING 5 8 4 7

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 11 7 11 PROFICIENT 57 57 51 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 25 34 34 WARNING 6 7 8 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 17 20 13 PROFICIENT 34 45 37 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 33 40 41 WARNING 8 5 3 6

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 15 8 8 PROFICIENT 58 57 52 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 25 36 33 WARNING 3 3 4 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 33 35 28 PROFICIENT 61 37 39 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 26 21 18 WARNING 4 4 4 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.