Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Freetown-Lakeville

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	27	33	42	36
PROFICIENT	54	53	51	54
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	16	13	6	10
FAILING	3	2	1	1

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	47	43	55	60
PROFICIENT	29	31	28	26
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	18	15	11
FAILING	5	8	3	3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	23	22
PROFICIENT	50	53	61
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	23	17
FAILING	4	2	0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	16	11	25	23
PROFICIENT	69	70	65	62
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	13	17	9	12
WARNING	2	2	1	2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	15	17	28	24
PROFICIENT	36	38	35	39
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	27	26	26
WARNING	16	18	11	11

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	0	3	3
PROFICIENT	37	33	39	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	50	50	48	49
WARNING	11	18	10	11

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	19	20	9
PROFICIENT	69	58	62	75
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	21	15	13
WARNING	4	2	3	3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	15	20	8
PROFICIENT	32	39	37	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	39	30	29	29
WARNING	22	16	13	15

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	17	17	17
PROFICIENT	64	60	59	58
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	19	20	21
WARNING	2	4	5	4

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	21	17	18	19
PROFICIENT	31	40	42	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	31	31	33
WARNING	13	13	9	11

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	22	14	11	18
PROFICIENT	49	56	53	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	25	29	25
WARNING	4	5	6	6

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	17	25	26	25
PROFICIENT	36	35	30	36
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	27	29	29
WARNING	13	14	14	10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	23	29	23	25
PROFICIENT	42	40	39	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	26	32	31
WARNING	5	4	6	4

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level