• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 47 40 47 48 PROFICIENT 41 50 45 42 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 7 5 6 FAILING 3 3 3 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 33 46 47 PROFICIENT 40 34 29 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 25 14 12 FAILING 8 8 11 7

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 24 32 30 PROFICIENT 49 52 44 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 11 18 15 16 FAILING 7 6 9 6

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 8 10 8 PROFICIENT 60 69 62 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 16 20 17 WARNING 6 7 9 12

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 13 7 8 PROFICIENT 34 26 29 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 35 29 39 WARNING 29 26 35 31

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 2 1 1 PROFICIENT 31 35 23 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 49 40 52 39 WARNING 15 23 24 26

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 10 8 7 PROFICIENT 64 56 58 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 27 25 25 WARNING 5 7 10 10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 11 9 7 PROFICIENT 28 25 31 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 39 27 34 WARNING 33 26 34 38

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 14 8 5 PROFICIENT 54 49 54 52 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 25 27 33 WARNING 7 11 11 10

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 15 11 16 PROFICIENT 27 33 34 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 38 33 38 34 WARNING 21 18 17 18

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 10 11 14 PROFICIENT 50 39 48 49 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 37 29 27 WARNING 12 14 12 10

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 16 20 30 PROFICIENT 32 29 29 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 33 32 23 WARNING 15 22 19 19

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 10 8 12 PROFICIENT 38 26 29 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 47 47 38 WARNING 15 17 16 15

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 5 10 8 PROFICIENT 36 34 32 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 45 43 42 WARNING 16 16 15 14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 10 14 11 PROFICIENT 29 31 31 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 47 44 45 WARNING 15 13 12 14

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 8 13 PROFICIENT 43 45 42 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 32 39 38 WARNING 9 10 12 7

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 18 27 26 PROFICIENT 50 34 37 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 35 25 24 WARNING 11 13 12 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.