• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 36 39 29 PROFICIENT 71 49 52 63 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 13 9 6 FAILING 1 1 1 2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 47 44 38 PROFICIENT 39 29 32 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 17 16 20 FAILING 6 6 8 12

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 20 10 18 PROFICIENT 47 48 45 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 31 42 40 FAILING 0 1 4 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 10 8 5 3 PROFICIENT 70 68 57 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 20 29 29 WARNING 4 4 9 2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 7 4 PROFICIENT 33 23 23 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 41 46 49 WARNING 20 24 24 17

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 1 0 1 PROFICIENT 26 22 21 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 61 50 57 58 WARNING 12 28 21 21

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 2 4 3 PROFICIENT 61 55 53 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 33 42 36 WARNING 2 10 1 8

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 8 8 4 PROFICIENT 30 31 27 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 48 43 27 WARNING 18 14 23 44

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 4 5 7 PROFICIENT 48 55 51 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 31 34 37 WARNING 9 10 10 8

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 11 12 6 PROFICIENT 39 37 24 15 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 33 32 51 WARNING 15 18 32 27

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 6 7 2 PROFICIENT 48 41 41 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 42 41 49 WARNING 8 11 11 14

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 12 8 11 PROFICIENT 32 22 35 29 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 41 38 35 WARNING 21 25 19 25

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 7 5 3 PROFICIENT 26 23 22 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 51 55 52 WARNING 21 20 18 25

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 7 2 2 PROFICIENT 29 26 28 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 55 52 47 43 WARNING 14 15 24 24

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 5 0 7 PROFICIENT 17 23 11 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 65 56 70 58 WARNING 17 16 19 13

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 8 7 5 PROFICIENT 50 43 44 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 42 46 53 WARNING 5 7 3 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 16 17 12 PROFICIENT 43 42 46 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 30 25 34 WARNING 7 11 13 11

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.