Massachusetts School and District Profiles

River Valley Charter School

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	27	18	26	21
PROFICIENT	73	71	65	71
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	0	7	10	7
WARNING	0	4	0	0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	30	25	35	32
PROFICIENT	27	36	52	29
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	32	10	39
WARNING	10	7	3	0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	4	3	0
PROFICIENT	43	43	52	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	57	46	42	57
WARNING	0	7	3	0

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	22	18	30
PROFICIENT	76	63	79	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	3	16	4	7
WARNING	3	0	0	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	31	19	14	33
PROFICIENT	28	41	64	44
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	31	21	15
WARNING	10	9	0	7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	21	29	37	24
PROFICIENT	68	50	60	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	12	21	0	12
WARNING	0	0	3	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	18	21	43	38
PROFICIENT	35	46	33	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	47	32	13	24
WARNING	0	0	10	0

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	11	26	14	9
PROFICIENT	68	48	51	74
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	23	34	15
WARNING	0	3	0	3

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	28	32	29	24
PROFICIENT	38	39	37	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	26	31	26
WARNING	3	3	3	12

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	42	17	6
PROFICIENT	48	32	49	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	34	26	34	47
WARNING	0	0	0	6

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	3	0	0
PROFICIENT	39	60	38	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	48	31	63	56
WARNING	3	6	0	6

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	12	11	0	3
PROFICIENT	55	29	39	15
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	27	60	61	71
WARNING	6	0	0	12

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	15	9	3	3
PROFICIENT	67	50	61	76
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	15	38	30	21
WARNING	3	3	6	0

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	18	3	12	3
PROFICIENT	39	41	48	58
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	44	24	27
WARNING	0	12	15	12

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level