• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation
• PARCC Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 38 48 62 54 PROFICIENT 57 48 35 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 4 4 2 FAILING 0 0 0 0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 56 55 65 61 PROFICIENT 33 31 22 24 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 14 11 13 FAILING 2 0 2 3

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 7 13 19 24 PROFICIENT 46 54 57 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 44 31 23 15 FAILING 2 3 0 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 4 PROFICIENT 59 66 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 21 WARNING 3 9

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 4 PROFICIENT 36 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 42 WARNING 22 33

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 2015 2016 ADVANCED 5 2 0 4 PROFICIENT 40 19 17 16 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 41 46 50 59 WARNING 14 33 33 21

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 16 PROFICIENT 66 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 20 27 WARNING 3 4

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 16 PROFICIENT 38 16 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 25 WARNING 32 42

NOTE: Spring 2016 results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test.