Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public School

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	22	29	36	40
PROFICIENT	72	64	64	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	6	7	0	0
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	33	7	14	33
PROFICIENT	44	60	64	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	11	13	21	27
WARNING	11	20	0	0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	0	0
PROFICIENT	50	60	71	87
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	39	40	29	13
WARNING	11	0	0	0

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	6	15	7
PROFICIENT	75	83	85	93
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	11	0	0
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	17	8	20
PROFICIENT	60	67	77	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	13	11	15	27
WARNING	7	6	0	7

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	18	16	35
PROFICIENT	100	76	79	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	0	6	5	5
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	42	47	53	50
PROFICIENT	53	35	32	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	0	12	11	10
WARNING	5	6	5	0

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	6	6	16
PROFICIENT	88	76	78	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	12	18	17	21
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	39	12	26
PROFICIENT	59	44	24	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	24	17	65	26
WARNING	18	0	0	16

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	22	6	11
PROFICIENT	65	61	41	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	17	47	26
WARNING	0	0	6	0

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	0	5	5
PROFICIENT	61	32	53	42
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	28	63	42	53
WARNING	0	5	0	0

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	17	11	0	11
PROFICIENT	22	32	42	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	56	53	58	53
WARNING	6	5	0	5

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	17	11	22	5
PROFICIENT	56	44	50	74
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	22	44	28	16
WARNING	6	0	0	5

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	6	17	11	11
PROFICIENT	56	33	56	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	33	33	32
WARNING	6	17	0	5

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level