Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Boston Collegiate Charter School

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	27	25	4
PROFICIENT	69	59	68	87
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	14	14	7	9
FAILING	3	0	0	0

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	55	70	89	72
PROFICIENT	34	30	11	28
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	0	0	0
FAILING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	8	10	16
PROFICIENT	63	69	56
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	29	21	29
FAILING	0	0	0

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	16	12	3	3
PROFICIENT	74	70	74	75
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	11	17	18	18
WARNING	0	2	5	3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	20	11	23
PROFICIENT	61	52	52	48
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	17	36	27
WARNING	4	12	0	2

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	0	5	2
PROFICIENT	40	43	36	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	49	50	56	52
WARNING	9	7	3	3

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	9	11	3	5
PROFICIENT	69	62	52	84
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	22	25	42	9
WARNING	0	3	3	2

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	22	22	15	13
PROFICIENT	50	45	41	57
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	19	29	43	27
WARNING	9	5	1	3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	11	4	24
PROFICIENT	66	55	64	58
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	22	31	30	12
WARNING	1	3	1	5

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	33	20	40	40
PROFICIENT	44	49	42	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	19	31	14	8
WARNING	3	0	3	5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	8	5	10	13
PROFICIENT	45	50	43	55
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	45	37	35	25
WARNING	1	8	11	7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	16	9	22
PROFICIENT	30	35	28	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	41	38	43	31
WARNING	18	11	20	9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	4	8	4	4
PROFICIENT	41	44	24	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	54	42	55	40
WARNING	1	6	18	10

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level