Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Neighborhood House Charter School

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	4	0	6	21
PROFICIENT	80	97	79	74
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	16	3	15	5
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	13	11	27	29
PROFICIENT	63	44	45	42
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	39	18	29
WARNING	4	6	9	0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	0	3	0
PROFICIENT	29	11	12	24
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	67	58	63
WARNING	29	22	27	13

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	12	26	11
PROFICIENT	68	82	74	77
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	28	6	0	11
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	3	18	20
PROFICIENT	55	39	56	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	39	26	31
WARNING	10	18	0	3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	21	3	7
PROFICIENT	58	47	48	59
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	28	48	27
WARNING	2	5	3	7

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	23	37	25	32
PROFICIENT	37	28	48	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	28	28	22
WARNING	14	7	0	5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	5	7	10
PROFICIENT	39	43	40	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	45	43	36	25
WARNING	11	10	17	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	16	20	14	8
PROFICIENT	34	23	40	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	30	33	30
WARNING	25	28	12	3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	13	5	8
PROFICIENT	32	20	31	23
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	48	55	45	58
WARNING	16	13	19	13

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	3	8	13
PROFICIENT	38	40	53	30
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	35	39	50
WARNING	25	23	0	8

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	10	8	11	13
PROFICIENT	15	20	16	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	45	65	68	35
WARNING	30	8	5	15

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	10	3	5
PROFICIENT	43	34	50	55
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	56	35	38
WARNING	20	0	13	3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	13	10	28	20
PROFICIENT	38	38	35	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	18	43	25	20
WARNING	33	10	13	0

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level