Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Community Day Charter Public School - Prospect

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	10	20	37	40
PROFICIENT	85	80	60	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	5	0	3	5
WARNING	0	0	0	3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	30	40	46	40
PROFICIENT	55	40	49	48
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	15	20	6	13
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	5	14	5
PROFICIENT	75	50	46	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	45	37	48
WARNING	0	0	3	3

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	35	43	20	20
PROFICIENT	65	51	70	55
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	0	6	10	25
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	20	23	33	45
PROFICIENT	45	51	48	30
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	26	20	20
WARNING	0	0	0	5

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	22	18	19	14
PROFICIENT	70	58	57	77
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	8	23	24	9
WARNING	0	3	0	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	49	35	52	59
PROFICIENT	46	55	33	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	5	10	14	0
WARNING	0	0	0	0

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	7	5	8	17
PROFICIENT	40	32	71	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	44	64	21	17
WARNING	9	0	0	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	16	14	29	52
PROFICIENT	37	32	54	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	45	17	4
WARNING	7	9	0	0

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	12	5	21	35
PROFICIENT	37	18	54	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	49	64	25	22
WARNING	2	14	0	0

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	0	4	4	33
PROFICIENT	25	52	70	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	75	35	26	16
WARNING	0	9	0	2

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	13	35	30	24
PROFICIENT	50	30	43	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	30	26	41
WARNING	0	4	0	8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	NA	8	12	13
PROFICIENT	46	52	43	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	40	41	30
WARNING	13	0	4	6

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	25	12	22	13
PROFICIENT	50	52	45	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	17	32	27	32
WARNING	8	4	6	2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level