Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Springfield

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	6	5	5
PROFICIENT	33	40	45	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	43	41	37	39
FAILING	20	13	13	13

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	14	11	14
PROFICIENT	20	23	25	23
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	35	38	34
FAILING	31	28	26	29

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	2	3
PROFICIENT	20	22	22
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	40	42
FAILING	38	36	33

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	2	3	4
PROFICIENT	37	39	45	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	34	32	31
WARNING	23	25	19	21

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	2	2	3
PROFICIENT	8	11	9	13
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	24	24	22	28
WARNING	66	62	66	55

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	1	0
PROFICIENT	7	9	7	8
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	33	36	39
WARNING	60	58	56	52

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	1	1	2	1
PROFICIENT	34	30	34	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	37	44	43	40
WARNING	28	25	21	22

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	1	2	2	2
PROFICIENT	9	10	14	16
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	23	29	30
WARNING	65	66	55	52

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	1	3	3	2
PROFICIENT	28	31	28	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	45	41	43	40
WARNING	26	26	26	27

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	4	5	4
PROFICIENT	11	15	16	15
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	28	30	34	31
WARNING	58	51	46	49

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	4	4	4	4
PROFICIENT	33	31	33	31
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	45	46	42
WARNING	21	20	17	23

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	8	7	7
PROFICIENT	21	20	23	19
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	37	37	35	35
WARNING	37	35	35	39

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	3	3	4
PROFICIENT	21	18	15	21
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	50	52	55	50
WARNING	26	27	27	26

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	2	2	2
PROFICIENT	29	25	26	24
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	45	48	45	46
WARNING	23	26	27	28

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	8	10	6	6
PROFICIENT	19	21	21	20
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	46	43	47	49
WARNING	27	27	26	26

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	6	6	6	6
PROFICIENT	34	26	30	33
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	41	42	43
WARNING	18	26	22	18

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	9	14	7	10
PROFICIENT	32	29	31	31
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	27	31	33
WARNING	33	30	31	27

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level