Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Shirley (non-op)

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	10	8	13	12
PROFICIENT	68	75	64	71
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	14	16	17
WARNING	2	3	7	1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	25	23	13	20
PROFICIENT	33	48	38	22
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	25	32	38
WARNING	18	5	18	20

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	2	0	0	0
PROFICIENT	33	32	20	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	50	51	59	54
WARNING	15	17	21	14

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	4	0	7
PROFICIENT	55	61	66	58
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	39	30	27	28
WARNING	2	5	7	7

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	9	7	11
PROFICIENT	36	14	44	23
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	46	36	31
WARNING	17	32	13	35

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	4	14	10
PROFICIENT	65	51	63	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	43	10	36
WARNING	6	2	12	5

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	16	9	14	21
PROFICIENT	26	33	33	29
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	28	39	35	35
WARNING	29	19	18	15

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	2	16	3	19
PROFICIENT	51	60	47	54
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	14	43	15
WARNING	9	11	7	13

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	21	12	26
PROFICIENT	37	25	32	28
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	37	39	31
WARNING	22	18	18	15

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	6	14	7	19
PROFICIENT	41	40	30	33
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	48	37	54	37
WARNING	6	9	9	11

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	1	6	14	4
PROFICIENT	26	24	41	39
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	56	56	33	44
WARNING	17	14	12	14

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	6	17	5
PROFICIENT	36	33	33	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	53	36	56
WARNING	11	8	14	7

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	7	18	14	15
PROFICIENT	59	48	52	55
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	28	26	29	28
WARNING	7	8	5	2

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	36	24	31	13
PROFICIENT	43	40	45	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	12	26	17	20
WARNING	9	10	7	2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level