• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 21 23 27 PROFICIENT 67 53 62 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 20 9 13 FAILING 5 6 6 5

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 33 41 38 39 PROFICIENT 35 24 32 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 23 16 20 FAILING 9 13 14 13

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 15 16 17 PROFICIENT 47 38 46 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 36 31 38 FAILING 9 11 7 8

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 10 7 3 PROFICIENT 63 60 50 60 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 20 28 23 WARNING 12 9 14 14

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 14 13 12 PROFICIENT 29 22 30 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 34 28 34 WARNING 28 30 29 33

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 0 1 0 1 PROFICIENT 22 20 21 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 43 41 47 41 WARNING 34 38 32 34

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 2 1 1 PROFICIENT 50 47 45 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 42 42 40 WARNING 14 9 13 18

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 8 10 5 PROFICIENT 21 21 19 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 36 27 23 WARNING 39 35 44 54

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 4 5 8 PROFICIENT 57 36 35 40 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 35 35 34 WARNING 11 26 25 18

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 8 12 17 PROFICIENT 32 22 23 21 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 31 26 29 WARNING 22 40 39 33

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 9 8 PROFICIENT 38 34 43 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 39 31 34 WARNING 20 18 16 15

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 16 18 19 PROFICIENT 20 24 26 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 26 29 29 WARNING 38 33 28 27

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 8 10 7 PROFICIENT 19 20 20 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 47 44 46 WARNING 38 25 25 24

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 4 1 2 PROFICIENT 24 31 30 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 38 47 48 WARNING 23 26 22 22

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 9 6 10 PROFICIENT 21 25 26 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 40 52 44 WARNING 31 26 16 22

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 10 4 6 PROFICIENT 37 45 34 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 42 29 50 38 WARNING 13 16 11 13

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 26 19 22 PROFICIENT 37 30 32 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 22 32 26 WARNING 24 22 17 14

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.