Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Reading

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	32	40	38	49
PROFICIENT	58	49	51	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	9	10	9	4
FAILING	1	1	2	0

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	60	64	74	78
PROFICIENT	28	25	18	14
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	11	9	6	8
FAILING	1	3	2	1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	22	33	34	40
PROFICIENT	54	47	54	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	20	11	9
FAILING	2	1	1	1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	22	24	21	20
PROFICIENT	70	71	63	67
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	6	4	12	10
WARNING	1	1	3	3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	41	36	24	23
PROFICIENT	32	35	34	36
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	23	29	30
WARNING	5	6	14	11

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	6	8	3	2
PROFICIENT	58	52	46	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	32	36	42	42
WARNING	4	5	9	7

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	24	17	14	15
PROFICIENT	65	66	75	75
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	15	9	9
WARNING	0	2	2	1

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	36	20	17	17
PROFICIENT	39	41	53	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	16	28	21	27
WARNING	8	11	9	10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	15	17	18
PROFICIENT	65	63	68	69
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	17	20	14	11
WARNING	1	2	0	2

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	32	33	36	38
PROFICIENT	39	40	41	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	22	22	17	18
WARNING	7	6	6	3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	19	20	27
PROFICIENT	64	61	65	59
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	17	18	14	12
WARNING	1	1	0	2

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	37	29	32	36
PROFICIENT	40	47	35	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	18	19	28	14
WARNING	5	5	5	4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	18	26	27	26
PROFICIENT	40	41	41	44
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	30	29	25
WARNING	2	3	2	5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	9	8	14	11
PROFICIENT	51	63	59	48
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	39	29	24	36
WARNING	2	0	3	5

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	25	21	24	21
PROFICIENT	43	44	44	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	34	29	31
WARNING	2	1	3	4

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	19	21	21	12
PROFICIENT	60	57	59	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	19	19	24
WARNING	1	3	1	1

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	40	41	43	21
PROFICIENT	41	43	46	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	17	13	8	14
WARNING	1	3	3	2

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level