Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Northampton

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	27	37	41	48
PROFICIENT	61	53	42	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	8	15	7
FAILING	2	2	2	2

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	58	54	57	56
PROFICIENT	25	26	21	28
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	11	15	15	13
FAILING	6	6	7	3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	19	21	31	30
PROFICIENT	56	50	49	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	26	18	21
FAILING	4	3	2	2

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	26	26	22	39
PROFICIENT	56	55	60	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	16	13	9	8
WARNING	3	6	9	1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	19	20	18	20
PROFICIENT	27	24	24	36
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	24	26	31	25
WARNING	30	31	27	18

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	5	5	3	6
PROFICIENT	45	36	42	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	36	41	47
WARNING	15	23	15	9

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	13	16	14
PROFICIENT	57	61	65	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	19	16	16	18
WARNING	6	10	4	8

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	20	10	19
PROFICIENT	25	32	46	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	30	29	25
WARNING	33	19	15	25

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	15	21	17	19
PROFICIENT	55	54	54	50
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	20	17	18
WARNING	9	5	13	13

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	12	19	14	15
PROFICIENT	33	33	31	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	29	30	29	35
WARNING	26	18	26	24

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	21	13	12	17
PROFICIENT	54	44	45	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	35	30	25
WARNING	4	8	12	8

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	21	14	17	16
PROFICIENT	29	22	27	33
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	32	32	28
WARNING	13	32	25	23

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	15	16	14	13
PROFICIENT	35	30	41	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	42	38	33	38
WARNING	8	16	12	12

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	6	10	4	8
PROFICIENT	31	38	45	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	46	36	37	35
WARNING	17	15	14	12

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	12	9	5	10
PROFICIENT	19	21	30	26
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	46	51	44	50
WARNING	23	19	21	14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	16	13	14	11
PROFICIENT	41	43	46	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	34	35	29
WARNING	12	10	5	10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	21	14	14	6
PROFICIENT	32	37	36	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	30	35	37
WARNING	22	19	15	14

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level