• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 29 35 39 PROFICIENT 66 61 60 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 8 4 7 FAILING 1 2 1 3

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 43 36 61 44 PROFICIENT 42 26 20 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 29 13 20 FAILING 3 8 6 4

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 12 18 14 PROFICIENT 57 56 49 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 27 31 29 FAILING 2 5 1 4

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 11 9 8 PROFICIENT 70 66 67 72 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 19 18 12 WARNING 6 5 6 9

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 7 2 17 PROFICIENT 26 26 17 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 40 33 23 WARNING 26 27 47 25

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 0 1 3 PROFICIENT 33 32 22 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 54 52 60 50 WARNING 13 16 17 13

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 13 9 10 7 PROFICIENT 55 58 67 58 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 26 26 14 24 WARNING 5 8 9 12

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 5 15 13 PROFICIENT 25 23 34 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 47 33 30 WARNING 28 26 18 29

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 6 9 16 PROFICIENT 56 63 51 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 20 26 24 WARNING 7 12 14 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 18 24 14 27 PROFICIENT 30 35 34 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 28 32 27 WARNING 16 14 19 14

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 11 13 11 PROFICIENT 57 41 47 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 28 38 31 26 WARNING 9 10 9 9

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 22 23 26 PROFICIENT 35 28 31 39 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 33 31 19 WARNING 13 17 15 17

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 14 21 33 PROFICIENT 39 31 33 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 39 43 33 24 WARNING 11 12 14 9

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 14 9 6 PROFICIENT 37 43 46 47 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 26 33 33 WARNING 12 16 12 14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 19 21 14 PROFICIENT 27 36 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 30 35 33 WARNING 9 16 9 10

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 12 9 11 PROFICIENT 45 55 47 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 24 37 35 WARNING 7 9 7 4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 35 33 40 PROFICIENT 55 34 38 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 24 20 17 WARNING 13 7 9 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.