• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 53 63 68 67 PROFICIENT 40 34 29 31 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 2 1 1 FAILING 2 0 1 1

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 70 72 76 75 PROFICIENT 22 21 16 19 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 5 5 5 5 FAILING 3 1 3 1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 37 40 30 43 PROFICIENT 50 47 54 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 12 14 8 FAILING 4 0 2 1

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 26 23 31 17 PROFICIENT 61 65 60 69 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 10 9 6 11 WARNING 4 3 3 4

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 26 27 24 PROFICIENT 34 36 37 36 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 28 23 29 WARNING 16 11 12 10

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 3 2 2 PROFICIENT 41 45 35 43 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 39 51 42 WARNING 11 13 12 13

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 24 26 22 25 PROFICIENT 60 60 63 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 12 12 11 12 WARNING 3 3 4 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 25 24 21 25 PROFICIENT 33 41 45 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 28 23 20 WARNING 14 7 11 10

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 20 24 21 26 PROFICIENT 61 57 59 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 14 17 13 WARNING 3 5 3 5

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 38 41 46 PROFICIENT 37 38 39 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 15 14 15 WARNING 9 10 6 7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 26 32 23 PROFICIENT 64 53 49 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 15 18 13 20 WARNING 4 3 6 5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 32 36 42 38 PROFICIENT 41 39 33 30 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 19 19 23 WARNING 9 6 7 9

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 16 24 31 23 PROFICIENT 42 38 41 41 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 36 35 22 31 WARNING 6 4 6 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 16 13 15 PROFICIENT 57 60 53 57 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 16 26 20 WARNING 5 7 8 8

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 23 18 25 26 PROFICIENT 36 45 39 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 31 34 30 WARNING 5 6 3 7

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 19 15 13 PROFICIENT 63 56 57 56 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 21 24 25 WARNING 7 4 4 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 33 48 42 PROFICIENT 57 35 34 37 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 26 11 15 WARNING 4 6 6 7

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.