Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Littleton

Districts Schools

2011

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	38	49	44	59
PROFICIENT	52	46	43	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	8	4	9	4
FAILING	2	0	4	0

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	61	74	72	71
PROFICIENT	26	22	15	22
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	12	2	8	5
FAILING	1	2	5	2

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	14	32	35	52
PROFICIENT	61	56	53	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	10	8	3
FAILING	2	2	4	1

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	15	23	20	24
PROFICIENT	69	71	64	68
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	8	6	12	5
WARNING	8	0	4	3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	26	36	11	19
PROFICIENT	34	29	35	34
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	27	38	30
WARNING	18	8	16	17

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	1	11	4	8
PROFICIENT	45	52	47	57
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	29	40	30
WARNING	16	8	9	5

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	29	21	15	32
PROFICIENT	66	60	71	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	4	16	12	8
WARNING	1	3	2	1

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	32	18	18	33
PROFICIENT	39	39	46	33
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	32	24	26
WARNING	2	11	12	8

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	28	24	24	23
PROFICIENT	50	56	64	61
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	18	18	9	12
WARNING	4	2	3	4

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	26	32	31	33
PROFICIENT	40	30	40	33
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	24	27	27	28
WARNING	10	11	3	6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	15	28	29	32
PROFICIENT	57	52	47	57
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	27	20	20	7
WARNING	1	1	3	4

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	30	30	31	38
PROFICIENT	29	35	29	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	31	29	17
WARNING	8	4	10	3

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	17	17	26	22
PROFICIENT	40	48	45	54
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	34	23	22
WARNING	4	2	6	2

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	7	10	18	12
PROFICIENT	56	49	54	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	29	36	21	35
WARNING	8	5	6	7

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	16	17	14	20
PROFICIENT	43	33	41	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	43	39	35
WARNING	4	6	5	2

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	26	17	23	9
PROFICIENT	46	52	55	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	26	20	25
WARNING	4	5	2	3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010	2011
ADVANCED	46	25	35	24
PROFICIENT	29	46	46	52
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	22	23	19	20
WARNING	4	7	1	4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level