• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 19 24 8 12 PROFICIENT 63 60 60 67 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 12 28 19 WARNING 4 4 4 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 24 14 16 PROFICIENT 28 40 31 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 28 32 32 WARNING 19 7 23 19

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 13 13 15 PROFICIENT 57 48 55 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 21 29 25 31 WARNING 5 10 7 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 22 10 18 31 PROFICIENT 39 31 40 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 36 29 25 WARNING 14 23 14 13

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2014 ADVANCED 17 PROFICIENT 48 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 WARNING 4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2014 ADVANCED 17 PROFICIENT 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 31 WARNING 18

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2014 ADVANCED 10 PROFICIENT 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 45 WARNING 12

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.