Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Holbrook

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	13	10	3	8
PROFICIENT	50	50	62	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	35	30	32
FAILING	8	6	5	13

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	30	24	20	25
PROFICIENT	37	34	29	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	28	41	21
FAILING	9	14	10	27

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	6	0
PROFICIENT	30	24	30
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	56	48
FAILING	30	14	23

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	4	1	3
PROFICIENT	65	63	67	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	23	24	26
WARNING	7	11	8	11

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	8	6	10
PROFICIENT	30	32	17	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	27	26	35	29
WARNING	40	34	42	33

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	0	0
PROFICIENT	13	19	11	20
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	51	50	51	51
WARNING	36	31	38	29

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	4	4	3
PROFICIENT	57	56	59	71
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	32	29	18
WARNING	8	8	9	9

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	6	4	6	13
PROFICIENT	30	22	34	39
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	32	33	34	27
WARNING	33	40	27	21

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	9	20	13
PROFICIENT	59	52	48	63
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	29	30	24	18
WARNING	7	9	8	6

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	19	27	24	28
PROFICIENT	34	34	32	35
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	22	28	24
WARNING	11	18	17	13

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	8	10	7	22
PROFICIENT	46	49	43	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	29	44	21
WARNING	14	12	6	7

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	23	16	28
PROFICIENT	38	29	33	29
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	30	29	31
WARNING	21	19	21	11

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	11	5	4
PROFICIENT	26	34	29	48
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	47	39	57	42
WARNING	23	16	10	6

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	3	14	10
PROFICIENT	39	42	46	46
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	39	41	27	34
WARNING	15	14	13	11

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	9	20	16	12
PROFICIENT	19	22	27	34
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	48	41	42	41
WARNING	24	17	15	14

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	16	8	6
PROFICIENT	40	32	40	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	36	40	39
WARNING	10	16	13	14

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	16	22	18	19
PROFICIENT	29	27	30	39
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	28	30	26
WARNING	19	23	22	16

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level