• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 49 64 59 PROFICIENT 54 46 33 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 6 5 3 2 FAILING 2 0 0 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 71 60 74 67 PROFICIENT 16 26 16 18 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 13 9 9 FAILING 4 1 1 6

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 38 34 39 32 PROFICIENT 51 51 54 54 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 13 6 10 FAILING 2 2 1 3

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 12 14 14 PROFICIENT 75 80 71 71 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 8 6 10 13 WARNING 3 2 5 1

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 34 20 19 15 PROFICIENT 38 33 40 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 35 27 38 WARNING 4 12 13 13

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 2 0 2 PROFICIENT 51 48 35 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 40 39 53 50 WARNING 5 10 12 11

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 11 11 9 PROFICIENT 69 68 71 77 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 17 16 12 WARNING 4 4 2 2

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 14 17 22 22 PROFICIENT 39 42 40 45 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 35 31 26 21 WARNING 12 11 11 12

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 17 20 18 13 PROFICIENT 65 63 55 61 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 14 14 19 20 WARNING 4 4 7 6

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 30 27 23 24 PROFICIENT 28 39 45 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 23 19 28 WARNING 13 11 13 16

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 21 31 23 22 PROFICIENT 56 41 47 50 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 17 21 24 24 WARNING 5 7 6 4

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 45 38 45 PROFICIENT 42 37 32 35 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 16 12 25 15 WARNING 11 6 6 5

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 12 20 21 PROFICIENT 49 43 35 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 29 40 36 37 WARNING 11 5 10 4

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 12 15 11 16 PROFICIENT 54 53 57 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 24 24 25 34 WARNING 11 9 6 12

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 27 24 17 29 PROFICIENT 38 38 46 32 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 32 28 33 28 WARNING 4 10 3 11

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 11 27 19 5 PROFICIENT 58 47 40 59 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 23 36 29 WARNING 8 3 5 6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 15 32 33 30 PROFICIENT 52 42 32 51 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 22 19 26 13 WARNING 10 6 9 6

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.