Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Abbott Memorial

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	7
PROFICIENT	64	43	71
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	29	29	14
WARNING	7	29	7

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	7	7
PROFICIENT	50	14	29
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	36	50
WARNING	14	43	14

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	0	7
PROFICIENT	21	29	14
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	57	29	64
WARNING	14	43	14

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	13	0
PROFICIENT	50	33	40	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	43	42	33	35
WARNING	7	25	13	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	14	8	13	6
PROFICIENT	14	17	20	35
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	57	42	47	41
WARNING	14	33	20	18

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	9	0	5	47
PROFICIENT	27	75	40	41
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	55	17	45	12
WARNING	9	8	10	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	9	17	10	29
PROFICIENT	36	33	40	59
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	36	25	40	12
WARNING	18	25	10	0

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	0	14	30
PROFICIENT	50	55	71	50
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	45	7	20
WARNING	10	0	7	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	9	57	0
PROFICIENT	20	36	21	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	45	14	60
WARNING	20	9	7	0

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	18	43	10
PROFICIENT	40	36	43	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	36	7	50
WARNING	20	9	7	0

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008
ADVANCED	0	0
PROFICIENT	55	69
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	27	31
WARNING	18	0

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008
ADVANCED	45	46
PROFICIENT	18	38
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	27	15
WARNING	9	0

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2010
ADVANCED	25	18
PROFICIENT	50	36
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	25	45
WARNING	0	0

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2010
ADVANCED	8	NA
PROFICIENT	58	82
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	18
WARNING	0	0

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level