Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Fall River

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	11	9	16	9
PROFICIENT	44	40	49	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	41	28	34
FAILING	10	11	7	9

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	22	18	17	24
PROFICIENT	21	25	29	29
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	35	36	30
FAILING	22	22	17	18

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	8	9
PROFICIENT	32	39	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	34	34	33
FAILING	27	19	18

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	2	4	5
PROFICIENT	51	53	60	57
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	33	31	25	27
WARNING	11	13	12	11

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	8	6	13
PROFICIENT	15	19	20	24
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	37	32	34	33
WARNING	46	42	41	31

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	0	0	0	1
PROFICIENT	16	20	20	21
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	51	48	46	49
WARNING	33	32	34	29

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	3	3	3
PROFICIENT	44	45	44	44
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	40	39	40	39
WARNING	14	13	13	14

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	4	5	8
PROFICIENT	16	19	23	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	34	34	32
WARNING	46	43	38	33

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	2	3	6	5
PROFICIENT	44	39	34	44
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	41	42	41	33
WARNING	13	16	20	17

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	3	8	9	14
PROFICIENT	22	24	25	25
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	35	31	32	34
WARNING	40	37	34	27

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	6	6	7	6
PROFICIENT	37	36	37	31
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	43	46	42	40
WARNING	14	12	14	22

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	10	8	12
PROFICIENT	22	21	23	22
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	38	37	37	34
WARNING	33	31	32	32

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	5	5	6	2
PROFICIENT	27	21	17	23
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	47	51	51	50
WARNING	20	23	27	25

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	4	4	6	5
PROFICIENT	31	25	22	26
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	52	49	49	43
WARNING	13	22	23	26

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	7	8	7
PROFICIENT	19	17	20	20
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	52	48	47	48
WARNING	22	28	25	25

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	7	6	5	5
PROFICIENT	38	29	30	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	44	46	46	45
WARNING	11	19	19	18

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	8	12	8	11
PROFICIENT	31	28	25	27
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	34	34	32	37
WARNING	27	26	35	25

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level