Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlisle

Districts Schools

2010

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	22	30	53	46
PROFICIENT	74	67	44	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	3	3	1	2
WARNING	1	1	2	5

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	60	47	56	52
PROFICIENT	28	36	31	32
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	8	14	10	8
WARNING	4	3	3	7

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	7	17	10
PROFICIENT	60	68	60	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	17	22	20	25
WARNING	3	4	3	6

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	32	41	36	39
PROFICIENT	63	54	53	51
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	5	4	7	10
WARNING	1	1	3	0

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	39	45	39	46
PROFICIENT	43	43	40	37
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	13	9	13	14
WARNING	5	4	9	3

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	26	27	36	32
PROFICIENT	64	58	47	65
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	8	11	17	3
WARNING	3	5	0	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	40	45	46	68
PROFICIENT	42	39	30	20
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	14	9	17	8
WARNING	4	7	7	3

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	35	23	26	33
PROFICIENT	53	53	66	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	21	8	15
WARNING	2	3	0	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	46	28	40	43
PROFICIENT	30	43	45	36
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	19	17	14	16
WARNING	4	12	1	5

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	34	29	25	28
PROFICIENT	48	38	57	49
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	15	29	16	20
WARNING	3	5	1	3

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	20	12	33	27
PROFICIENT	51	65	52	58
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	22	16	14
WARNING	3	0	0	2

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	34	53	30	29
PROFICIENT	31	33	43	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	30	13	23	23
WARNING	5	0	3	2

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	21	25	11	26
PROFICIENT	65	56	67	54
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	13	18	19	17
WARNING	0	1	3	3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2007	2008	2009	2010
ADVANCED	36	32	38	37
PROFICIENT	52	49	45	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	14	11	7
WARNING	2	4	6	4

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level