Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlisle

Districts Schools

2009

Related Links:

MCAS Results

Did You Know:

MCAS results are used for
- Improvements in teaching and learning
- School and district accountability
- Student accountability

print page

MCAS Annual Comparisons

* NOTE: Performance level percentages are not calculated if student group less than 10.
Data Last Updated on September 27, 2012

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	37	22	30	53
PROFICIENT	56	74	67	44
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	3	3	3	1
WARNING	4	1	1	2

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	37	60	47	56
PROFICIENT	44	28	36	31
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	14	8	14	10
WARNING	6	4	3	3

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	15	20	7	17
PROFICIENT	60	60	68	60
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	17	22	20
WARNING	5	3	4	3

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	24	32	41	36
PROFICIENT	69	63	54	53
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	6	5	4	7
WARNING	1	1	1	3

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	43	39	45	39
PROFICIENT	40	43	43	40
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	10	13	9	13
WARNING	7	5	4	9

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	19	26	27	36
PROFICIENT	67	64	58	47
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	11	8	11	17
WARNING	3	3	5	0

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	28	40	45	46
PROFICIENT	45	42	39	30
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	14	9	17
WARNING	6	4	7	7

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	25	35	23	26
PROFICIENT	60	53	53	66
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	13	10	21	8
WARNING	2	2	3	0

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	37	46	28	40
PROFICIENT	39	30	43	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	20	19	17	14
WARNING	5	4	12	1

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	35	34	29	25
PROFICIENT	41	48	38	57
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	15	29	16
WARNING	2	3	5	1

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	6	20	12	33
PROFICIENT	64	51	65	52
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	26	26	22	16
WARNING	5	3	0	0

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	27	34	53	30
PROFICIENT	36	31	33	43
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	31	30	13	23
WARNING	6	5	0	3

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	25	21	25	11
PROFICIENT	49	65	56	67
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	23	13	18	19
WARNING	3	0	1	3

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS
PERFORMANCE LEVEL	2006	2007	2008	2009
ADVANCED	12	36	32	38
PROFICIENT	60	52	49	45
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT	21	10	14	11
WARNING	7	2	4	6

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS - Percentage of Students by Performance Level