• MCAS Percent of Students at Each Achievement Level
• MCAS Annual Comparisons
• Item by Item Results (for each Grade/Subject)
• MCAS Student Growth Report
• MCAS Results by Student Group
• Participation Report
• High School Science and Technology/Engineering Results
• MCAS Open Response Item Results
• ACCESS for ELLs
• SAT Performance
• Advanced Placement Performance
• Advanced Placement Participation

MCAS Annual Comparisons

GRADE 10 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 28 31 35 29 PROFICIENT 47 48 50 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 18 16 11 14 FAILING 6 5 5 4

GRADE 10 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 31 40 35 37 PROFICIENT 31 26 29 25 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 25 20 20 24 FAILING 14 14 16 14

GRADE 10 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 12 10 13 PROFICIENT 42 43 42 44 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 34 37 32 FAILING 13 11 11 11

GRADE 08 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 9 6 4 PROFICIENT 58 59 58 62 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 23 23 24 25 WARNING 10 9 12 10

GRADE 08 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 8 8 8 4 PROFICIENT 25 24 32 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 35 30 37 WARNING 34 33 31 31

GRADE 08 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 1 1 0 0 PROFICIENT 15 18 17 20 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 47 41 51 48 WARNING 37 40 32 32

GRADE 07 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 5 4 4 3 PROFICIENT 50 53 50 53 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 30 36 34 WARNING 11 13 10 10

GRADE 07 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 6 6 5 6 PROFICIENT 25 24 26 23 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 30 38 33 30 WARNING 39 33 36 41

GRADE 06 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 4 5 4 PROFICIENT 41 39 37 38 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 35 36 39 WARNING 18 22 22 19

GRADE 06 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 10 10 10 PROFICIENT 24 26 28 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 33 31 32 34 WARNING 34 33 30 30

GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 7 5 4 4 PROFICIENT 39 32 35 34 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 40 40 41 WARNING 17 23 21 21

GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 9 10 11 13 PROFICIENT 26 22 28 26 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 34 34 35 34 WARNING 31 35 26 28

GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECH/ENG ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 4 4 5 PROFICIENT 17 16 15 16 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 41 50 46 WARNING 35 38 32 33

GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 3 3 3 PROFICIENT 25 25 24 27 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 41 45 44 WARNING 26 30 28 25

GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 4 3 7 7 PROFICIENT 18 19 23 22 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 52 50 49 46 WARNING 26 28 21 25

GRADE 03 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 2 5 2 2 PROFICIENT 31 31 25 28 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 46 43 53 47 WARNING 21 20 20 23

GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL 2011 2012 2013 2014 ADVANCED 3 10 13 11 PROFICIENT 34 27 31 33 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 37 31 34 30 WARNING 25 32 22 25

1 Some students were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS testing in this subject because they participated in the PARCC field test. This data represents only those students who participated in MCAS.
2 All students participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.
3 Burlington students in grades 3-8 participated in the PARCC field tests in ELA and math and were exempt from the spring 2014 MCAS test administration in both subjects.