Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Williams Middle

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Williams Middle

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Longmeadow (01590000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Williams Middle (01590305)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-
Mathematics achievement44-04-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total71267.52867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth24-24-
Growth total5822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total5.910.3-2.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 57%-33%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage45%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement04-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement24-
Achievement total21267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total2.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 22%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage22%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 64

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 510.0 511.7 1.7 511.7 3233Met Target
Lowest Performing 488.0 490.2 2.2 491.9 552Improved Below Target
High needs 497.4 496.4 -1.0 499.0 730Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 495.0 492.6 -2.4 496.3 600Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 519.7 529.0 9.3 521.6 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 510.0 510.9 0.9 511.6 2723Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 513.2 511.6 -1.6 514.4 3224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 493.3 491.2 -2.1 496.1 550Declined
High needs 496.7 494.4 -2.3 498.1 730Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 494.7 491.3 -3.4 496.5 600Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 528.4 531.3 2.9 530.8 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 512.7 510.7 -2.0 514.0 2714Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 87.7 84.2 -3.5 89.9 1200Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 70.0 71.4 1.4 73.2 282Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 10--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 66.7 66.7 0.0 69.6 211No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.7 84.1 -5.6 91.8 1040Declined

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.0 50.0 3143Met Target
Lowest Performing 55.6 50.0 553Met Target
High needs 50.2 50.0 703Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 49.2 50.0 572Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 66.3 50.0 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.7 50.0 2663Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.3 50.0 3122Below Target
Lowest Performing 44.7 50.0 552Below Target
High needs 39.3 50.0 701Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 40.3 50.0 572Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 57.1 50.0 233Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.1 50.0 2642Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.6 9.6 -3.0 5.6 3350Declined
Lowest Performing 5.4 16.4 -11.0 2.2 550Declined
High needs 11.1 12.3 -1.2 9.1 730Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 8.6 6.8 1.8 5.9 592Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 5.0 0.0 5.0 2.8 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.3 10.0 -3.7 5.2 2800Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 331 32999Yes 1 331 32899Yes 1 125 12398Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 74 74100Yes 1 74 74100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 18---- 18---- 11----
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 60 60100Yes 1 60 60100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 23 23100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 18---- 18---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 8---- 8---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 277 27599Yes 1 277 27499Yes 1 108 10698Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles