Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Squantum

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Squantum

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Quincy (02430000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Squantum (02430095)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total111260.08867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total2410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total8.59.6-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 89%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage90%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total7822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total3410.0
Weighted total10.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 97%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage97%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 89

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.2 515.0 6.8 509.9 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 487.7 492.5 4.8 491.6 214Exceeded Target
High needs 503.2 509.2 6.0 504.8 814Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 500.6 511.3 10.7 502.2 424Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 501.8 511.9 10.1 503.2 304Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 498.0 497.3 -0.7 499.3 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 503.4 513.2 9.8 505.3 394Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 511.3 518.9 7.6 512.9 904Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 500.7 503.6 2.9 501.9 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 479.5 486.0 6.5 482.3 214Exceeded Target
High needs 495.6 500.3 4.7 497.0 814Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.9 498.1 5.2 493.9 424Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 503.0 508.7 5.7 504.6 304Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 491.2 492.2 1.0 493.0 342Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 502.9 508.8 5.9 505.3 394Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.8 503.9 2.1 503.1 904Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 74.6 77.5 2.9 76.8 503Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.3 70.8 12.5 61.5 244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 76.7 81.5 4.8 78.8 234Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.8 50.0 963Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.4 50.0 212Below Target
High needs 52.6 50.0 493Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.4 50.0 244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 61.3 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 61.3 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.7 50.0 543Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.0 50.0 964Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 57.0 50.0 213Met Target
High needs 62.9 50.0 494Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 64.3 50.0 244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 72.5 50.0 204Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 67.4 50.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 3--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 58.7 50.0 543Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.7 69.2 2.5 78.2 262Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 66.7 69.2 2.5 78.2 262Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.5 9.3 1.2 9.5 2793Met Target
Lowest Performing 18.2 14.3 3.9 15.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs 15.3 13.6 1.7 13.3 1403Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.7 16.7 3.0 15.5 662Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 7.1 5.3 1.8 3.0 572Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 17.2 17.2 0.0 14.5 641No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 8.0 8.8 -0.8 5.8 800Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 10.1 7.4 2.7 9.0 1634Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 156 156100Yes 1 156 156100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 83 83100Yes 1 83 83100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 44 44100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 17----
EL and Former EL 31 31100Yes 1 31 31100Yes 1 10----
Students w/ disabilities 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 6----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 40 40100Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1 17----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 92 92100Yes 1 92 92100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles