Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leroy E.Mayo

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Leroy E.Mayo

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Wachusett (07750000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Leroy E.Mayo (07750032)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement34-34-
Science achievement44----
Achievement total91267.57867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total7822.56822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total8.110.3-6.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 79%-86%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total2867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total3.17.6-
Percentage of possible points 41%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage41%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 82

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.2 505.8 0.6 506.9 2482Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 487.8 493.4 5.6 491.7 414Exceeded Target
High needs 497.5 497.8 0.3 499.1 522Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 491.7 491.2 -0.5 493.0 321No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.3 505.6 0.3 506.9 2112Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.0 503.7 0.7 504.2 2463Met Target
Lowest Performing 485.5 487.8 2.3 488.3 413Met Target
High needs 497.2 493.3 -3.9 498.6 520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 489.7 488.3 -1.4 491.5 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 503.3 503.7 0.4 504.6 2092Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.4 90.1 7.7 84.6 864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 15--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 82.3 89.9 7.6 84.4 674Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 50.0 1683Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.6 50.0 413Met Target
High needs 53.2 50.0 363Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 52.6 50.0 213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.6 50.0 1393Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.2 50.0 1674Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 54.4 50.0 413Met Target
High needs 58.0 50.0 363Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 13--
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 57.0 50.0 213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.0 50.0 1384Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.9 2.8 2.1 3.9 4304Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 4.9 0.0 4.9 1.7 414Exceeded Target
High needs 8.2 5.0 3.2 6.2 1014Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 37--
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities 4.7 3.9 0.8 2.0 513Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 21--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.7 2.4 3.3 4.6 3684Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 260 25498Yes 1 260 25297Yes 1 88 8799Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 56 5496Yes 1 56 5496Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 21 2095Yes 1 21 2095Yes 1 6----
EL and Former EL 10---- 10---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 35 3497Yes 1 35 3497Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 6----
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 221 21597Yes 1 221 21396Yes 1 69 6899Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles