Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Shawsheen Valley Vocational Technical High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Shawsheen Valley Vocational Technical High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Shawsheen Valley Regional Vocational Technical (08710000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Shawsheen Valley Vocational Technical High School (08710605)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-34-
Mathematics achievement14-34-
Science achievement14-14-
Achievement total61247.571267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-44-
Mathematics growth44-34-
Growth total8822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-34-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total6810.03410.0
Weighted total7.310.7-6.610.3-
Percentage of possible points 68%-64%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage66%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total61247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total8822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total71220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total6.110.7-
Percentage of possible points 57%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 99.0 0.1 100.0 3214Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 95.9 96.7 0.8 97.3 833Met Target
High needs 97.4 97.6 0.2 99.0 1254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.7 98.8 0.1 100.0 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 96.1 96.3 0.2 98.0 812Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.0 99.1 0.1 100.0 2944Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.5 93.2 -0.3 95.0 3191No Change
Lowest Performing 77.3 78.6 1.3 79.3 833Met Target
High needs 85.1 84.8 -0.3 87.3 1251No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 87.9 92.4 4.5 89.9 594Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 78.9 77.5 -1.4 81.9 811No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.1 93.7 -0.4 95.7 2921No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 94.6 -0.6 96.6 3071No Change
Lowest Performing 83.7 82.8 -0.9 85.8 831No Change
High needs 89.1 87.5 -1.6 91.4 1161No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.9 94.1 0.2 95.8 552Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 84.4 80.8 -3.6 86.7 730Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.4 94.9 -0.5 96.8 2821No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.7 50.0 3074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 67.0 50.0 804Exceeded Target
High needs 68.8 50.0 1184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 68.2 50.0 564Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 69.2 50.0 784Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 72.7 50.0 2804Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 62.9 50.0 3054Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 56.4 50.0 803Met Target
High needs 61.7 50.0 1184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 59.5 50.0 553Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 62.0 50.0 784Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 62.7 50.0 2784Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 97.0 -2.1 100.0 3323Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 99.3 93.8 -5.5 100.0 1440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.9 95.3 -3.6 100.0 853Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 98.9 91.8 -7.1 100.0 850Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.4 96.7 -2.7 100.0 3023Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 99.4 0.9 99.5 3374Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 98.1 99.3 1.2 100.0 1424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.5 98.9 1.4 100.0 873Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 97.0 98.9 1.9 100.0 883Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 99.7 1.2 99.6 3244Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.2 -0.1 1.0 1,3363Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.2 0.4 -0.2 1.0 4453Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1754Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.6 -0.6 1.0 3213Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino---- 58--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.2 -0.2 1.0 1,2233Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.2 6.9 -2.7 3.2 1,3273Met Target
Lowest Performing 3.5 8.4 -4.9 0.0 833Met Target
High needs 7.1 12.1 -5.0 4.4 4550Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.0 15.5 -6.5 5.2 1870Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 6.8 9.6 -2.8 2.9 2820Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 62--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 4.2 7.0 -2.8 2.9 1,2093Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 65.3 69.5 4.2 68.5 6553Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 51.0 48.2 -2.8 59.0 2200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 52.5 53.6 1.1 61.0 972Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 52.1 42.2 -9.9 59.6 1470Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 65.0 70.3 5.3 68.0 5994Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 322 321100Yes 1 320 319100Yes 1 320 319100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 126 12599Yes 1 125 125100Yes 1 124 124100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 60 60100Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1 59 59100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 1---- 1---- 1----
Students w/ disabilities 82 8199Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1 80 80100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 3---- 3---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 4---- 4---- 4----
Hispanic/Latino 17---- 17---- 17----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 295 294100Yes 1 293 292100Yes 1 293 292100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles