Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tahanto Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Tahanto Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Berlin-Boylston (06200000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Tahanto Regional High (06200505)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08,09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-44-34-
Science achievement04----44-44-
Achievement total21267.52867.5121247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-44----
Mathematics growth34-24-44-44-
Growth total5822.54822.58822.54422.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------44----
Extended engagement rate------34----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-44-44-14-
Advanced coursework completion------04----
Additional indicators total0410.04410.04810.01410.0
Weighted total2.510.3-2.77.6-10.110.7-8.49.4-
Percentage of possible points 24%-36%-94%-89%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan30%
Weight of non-high school results:50%
92%
Weight of high school results:50%
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.6 502.1 0.5 503.3 2692Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 480.0 481.2 1.2 483.9 392Improved Below Target
High needs---- 89--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 52--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.6 502.9 1.3 503.2 2393Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 714Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 5--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 674Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 503.9 502.5 -1.4 505.1 2690Declined
Lowest Performing 484.0 482.6 -1.4 486.8 390Declined
High needs---- 89--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 52--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 504.0 503.3 -0.7 505.3 2390Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 99.0 0.7 99.8 734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.6 96.7 2.1 96.6 233Met Target
High needs---- 24--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 99.3 0.7 100.0 684Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.1 85.2 -2.9 90.3 880Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 27--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 7--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.0 87.2 -1.8 91.1 803Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.7 99.3 -0.4 100.0 704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.9 98.9 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 6--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 99.2 -0.4 100.0 654Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.0 50.0 2632Below Target
Lowest Performing 49.2 50.0 392Below Target
High needs-- 85--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 39--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 45.5 50.0 2362Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.8 50.0 634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-- 19--
High needs-- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 4--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.1 50.0 604Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.0 50.0 2623Met Target
Lowest Performing 44.6 50.0 392Below Target
High needs-- 85--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 39--
EL and Former EL-- 12--
Students w/ disabilities-- 50--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.2 50.0 2353Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.5 50.0 644Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 65.3 50.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs-- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 6--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.1 50.0 604Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.3 97.7 3.4 95.5 864Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 0--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.8 97.5 3.7 95.2 804Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 97.1 -2.9 100.0 703Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 15--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 8--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 96.9 -3.1 100.0 653Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.0 0.3 1.7 1.8 3164Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 67--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 48--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.8 0.3 1.5 1.6 2934Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 2.2 5.1 -2.9 1.2 2770Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 2.6 -2.6 0.0 394Exceeded Target
High needs---- 90--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 34--
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 53--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 2.5 4.9 -2.4 1.4 2460Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.9 8.5 2.4 9.9 3174Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 13.0 13.0 0.0 7.7 231No Change
High needs---- 73--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 12--
Students w/ disabilities---- 41--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.5 8.8 2.7 10.2 2834Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.1 65.2 -2.9 71.3 1610Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 33--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 67.5 64.4 -3.1 70.5 1460Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 346 34399Yes 1 347 346100Yes 1 162 15998Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 114 11197Yes 1 115 11499Yes 1 52 5096Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 46 4496Yes 1 47 47100Yes 1 14----
EL and Former EL 16---- 16---- 8----
Students w/ disabilities 72 6996Yes 1 73 7299Yes 1 36 3597Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 11---- 11---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 14---- 14---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 311 30999Yes 1 312 311100Yes 1 149 14698Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles