Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Oakmont Regional High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Oakmont Regional High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Ashburnham-Westminster (06100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Oakmont Regional High School (06100505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-14-
Mathematics achievement14-04-
Science achievement34-24-
Achievement total81247.531267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-04-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total4822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-34-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.03410.0
Weighted total7.210.7-2.810.3-
Percentage of possible points 67%-27%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage47%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total11247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total91220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total3.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 34%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage34%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 50

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.4 98.5 0.1 99.8 1724Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.3 94.9 -1.4 98.1 441No Change
High needs 94.4 94.0 -0.4 96.4 421No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.0 96.3 -2.7 100.0 270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 90.6 89.6 -1.0 93.1 241No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 98.5 0.0 99.8 1644Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.3 94.6 -0.7 97.0 1711No Change
Lowest Performing 85.1 82.4 -2.7 87.9 440Declined
High needs 89.7 81.5 -8.2 91.8 420Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.0 84.3 -9.7 97.1 270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 84.4 71.9 -12.5 87.4 240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.2 94.5 -0.7 96.8 1631No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.5 93.9 1.4 94.2 1593Met Target
Lowest Performing 79.2 80.7 1.5 83.5 442Improved Below Target
High needs 83.7 79.2 -4.5 86.5 360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.1 78.3 -10.8 92.0 230Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 78.3 69.0 -9.3 81.3 210Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.9 93.6 0.7 94.7 1533Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 33.9 50.0 1541Below Target
Lowest Performing 23.7 50.0 410Below Target
High needs 31.4 50.0 351Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.4 50.0 241Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 33.3 50.0 1471Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.8 50.0 1523Met Target
Lowest Performing 41.8 50.0 402Below Target
High needs 51.2 50.0 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 53.6 50.0 233Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.3 50.0 1453Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.1 94.2 0.1 96.4 1732Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.0 90.5 3.5 91.1 742Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.7 91.3 -1.4 97.8 460Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 74.3 83.8 9.5 80.8 374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 94.4 -1.1 97.6 1610Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.9 100.0 4.1 97.6 1694Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.3 100.0 6.7 97.3 774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.9 100.0 2.1 100.0 554Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 88.0 100.0 12.0 92.8 354Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.4 100.0 4.6 97.2 1554Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.3 -0.2 1.0 6933Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.6 -0.6 1.0 1723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.1 -1.1 1.0 930Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.0 -1.0 1.0 1023Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6543Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.7 4.1 -0.4 2.6 7074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 6.8 -6.8 0.0 443Met Target
High needs 10.3 9.9 0.4 7.9 1822Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.2 7.4 3.8 6.6 943Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 10.7 15.6 -4.9 7.6 960Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.5 4.2 -0.7 2.3 6654Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.2 58.4 6.2 57.9 3443Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 17.2 23.2 6.0 25.7 822Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.9 33.3 5.4 38.3 452Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 1.9 4.8 2.9 9.2 422Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 52.8 58.2 5.4 58.1 3253Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 175 17499Yes 1 175 17399Yes 1 175 17399Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 2---- 2---- 2----
Students w/ disabilities 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 2---- 2---- 2----
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 166 16599Yes 1 166 16499Yes 1 166 16499Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles