Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bentley Academy Charter School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Bentley Academy Charter School
Organization Information
District:Bentley Academy Charter School (District) (35110000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bentley Academy Charter School (35110205)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.8, Target = 78.8CPI = 79.8, Target = 78.8 63.7 66.9 79.8 12.9 78.8 81.9 279875On Target
High needsCPI = 77.4, Target = 74.3CPI = 77.4, Target = 74.3CPI = 77.4, Target = 74.3 56.0 61.5 77.4 15.9 74.3 78.0 5972100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.2, Target = 63.2CPI = 80.2, Target = 63.2CPI = 80.2, Target = 63.2 59.8 59.8 80.2 20.4 63.2 79.9 6858100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 71, Target = 69.7CPI = 71, Target = 69.7CPI = 71, Target = 69.7 48.1 57.8 71.0 13.2 69.7 74.1 5225100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77.1, Target = 71.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 71.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 71.5 51.1 59.2 77.1 17.9 71.5 75.6 6948100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 86.3, Target = 85.4 75.0 76.4 86.3 9.9 85.4 87.5 393175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84, Target = 76.3CPI = 84, Target = 76.3CPI = 84, Target = 76.3 59.3 73.4 84.0 10.6 76.3 79.7 4497100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 72.2CPI = 82, Target = 72.2CPI = 82, Target = 72.2 52.3 69.6 82.0 12.4 72.2 76.2 7571100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.6, Target = 71CPI = 83.6, Target = 71CPI = 83.6, Target = 71 68.4 68.4 83.6 15.2 71.0 84.2 7958100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 74, Target = 66.8CPI = 74, Target = 66.8CPI = 74, Target = 66.8 43.1 69.5 74.0 4.5 66.8 71.6 5024100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 81.9, Target = 69.4CPI = 81.9, Target = 69.4CPI = 81.9, Target = 69.4 47.5 69.4 81.9 12.5 69.4 73.8 7947100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.5, Target = 83CPI = 89.5, Target = 83CPI = 89.5, Target = 83 70.8 80.0 89.5 9.5 83.0 85.4 5931100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 60.7, Target = 80.2CPI = 60.7, Target = 80.2CPI = 60.7, Target = 80.2 66.0 51.4 60.7 9.3 80.2 83.0 142850Improved Below Target
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------12--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.3 9.29825 25.0 8.29825
High needs 2.6 6.97225 30.8 9.77225
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.1 8.65825 34.4 6.95825
EL and Former EL 0.0 4.02525 37.5 16.02525
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 4.1 6.34825 32.7 12.54825
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.3 12.93125 16.7 3.23125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.8 20.69725 14.7 7.29725
High needs 11.5 15.57125 17.9 8.57125
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.5 17.25825 18.8 6.95825
EL and Former EL 9.4 0.0240 15.6 16.7240
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino 10.2 12.84725 16.3 6.44725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 29.03125 11.4 3.23125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 3.62825 38.9 28.62825
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--12---12-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 46.0 56.5 10.5 51.0Yes6275On Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 47.0 58.0 11.0 51.0Yes4775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 47.0 64.0 17.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-20--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 49.0 48.0 -1.0 51.0Yes3575On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-19--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 69.0 60.0 -9.0 51.0Yes61100Above Target
High needsSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 69.0 57.5 -11.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 69.0 55.0 -14.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 56.0 53.5 -2.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-19--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.015-
High needs- 60.015-
EL and Former EL- 60.015-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9898100Yes989799Yes2828100Yes
High needs7272100Yes727199Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged5858100Yes5858100Yes15---
EL and Former EL2525100Yes252496Yes7---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---1---
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---2---
Hispanic/Latino4848100Yes484798Yes13---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3131100Yes3131100Yes12---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles