Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Powder Mill School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Powder Mill School

Organization Information
District:Southwick-Tolland-Granville Regional School District (07660000)School type:Elementary School
School:Powder Mill School (07660315)Grades served:03,04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 86.6, Target = 85.8 84.5 84.5 86.6 2.1 85.8 92.3 5540275On Target
High needsCPI = 74.7, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.7, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.7, Target = 72.9 70.4 70.4 74.7 4.3 72.9 85.2 44165100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.6, Target = 81.1CPI = 79.6, Target = 81.1CPI = 79.6, Target = 81.1 79.4 79.4 79.6 0.2 81.1 89.7 6410450Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 66.8, Target = 65.3CPI = 66.8, Target = 65.3CPI = 66.8, Target = 65.3 62.1 62.1 66.8 4.7 65.3 81.1 5792100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.6, Target = 85.9CPI = 86.6, Target = 85.9 84.6 84.6 86.6 2.0 85.9 92.3 4136975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 84.3CPI = 81.3, Target = 84.3CPI = 81.3, Target = 84.3 82.9 82.9 81.3 -1.6 84.3 91.5 3140225No Change
High needsCPI = 69.3, Target = 72.6CPI = 69.3, Target = 72.6CPI = 69.3, Target = 72.6 70.1 70.1 69.3 -0.8 72.6 85.1 2316625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.2, Target = 78.5CPI = 75.2, Target = 78.5CPI = 75.2, Target = 78.5 76.5 76.5 75.2 -1.3 78.5 88.3 4410425No Change
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.1, Target = 65.6CPI = 59.1, Target = 65.6CPI = 59.1, Target = 65.6 62.5 62.5 59.1 -3.4 65.6 81.3 34930Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.2, Target = 85CPI = 82.2, Target = 85CPI = 82.2, Target = 85 83.6 83.6 82.2 -1.4 85.0 91.8 2136925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.1, Target = 85.7CPI = 80.1, Target = 85.7CPI = 80.1, Target = 85.7 84.4 84.4 80.1 -4.3 85.7 92.2 48990Declined
High needsCPI = 68.1, Target = 77.1CPI = 68.1, Target = 77.1CPI = 68.1, Target = 77.1 75.0 75.0 68.1 -6.9 77.1 87.5 51470Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities  65.5---- 82.8-34--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.7, Target = 86.7CPI = 80.7, Target = 86.7CPI = 80.7, Target = 86.7 85.5 85.5 80.7 -4.8 86.7 92.8 30920Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.8 14.74020 7.8 6.240225
High needs 8.2 8.51650 19.0 15.216525
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.8 9.61040 11.8 10.610425
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 3.9 5.49225 24.3 23.9920
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.6 15.23690 8.2 6.236925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 21.7 21.14020 6.8 9.04020
High needs 14.0 11.41660 15.9 21.11660
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.0 15.41040 10.7 14.41040
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 7.8 5.4930 23.5 33.3930
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.6 22.23690 6.8 8.43690
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.5 18.29925 6.7 9.1990
High needs 7.7 10.64725 15.4 19.1470
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--34---34-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.2 19.69225 5.1 9.8920
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 44.5 48.0 3.5 51.0No29550Below Target
High needsSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 41.0 38.0 -3.0 51.0No11825Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 52.0 40.0 -12.0 51.0No7025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 35.0 36.0 1.0 51.0No7250Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 45.0 47.5 2.5 51.0No27250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 42.0 44.0 2.0 51.0No29550Below Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 44.0 43.0 -1.0 51.0No11950Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 46.0 46.0 0.0 51.0No7050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-10--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 43.5 41.0 -2.5 51.0No7350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-9--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 42.0 44.0 2.0 51.0No27250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students412410100Yes412410100Yes10110099Yes
High needs17117099Yes171171100Yes4848100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged108108100Yes108108100Yes24---
EL and Former EL16---16---4---
Students w/ disabilities949399Yes9494100Yes3434100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3---2---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White37737599Yes37737599Yes949399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles