Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Martha's Vineyard Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Martha's Vineyard Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Martha's Vineyard (07000000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Martha's Vineyard Regional High (07000505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-04-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement04-04-
Achievement total41240.001267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth14-04-
Growth total4820.02822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion24----
Additional indicators total2810.00410.0
Weighted total4.710.0-0.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 47%-5%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage26%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total31247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion24-
Additional indicators total2810.0
Weighted total4.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 40%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 35

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 97.8 0.7 98.6 1604Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.7 95.1 -2.6 99.8 360Declined
High needs 93.3 94.7 1.4 95.4 663Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.2 95.9 -0.3 97.8 371No Change
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 92.0 93.2 1.2 94.5 332Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.2 0.3 100.0 1244Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.5 88.8 -3.7 94.4 1580Declined
Lowest Performing 83.6 59.7 -23.9 87.8 360Declined
High needs 81.6 75.0 -6.6 83.8 650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.0 79.7 -4.3 86.4 370Declined
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities 72.0 66.4 -5.6 75.7 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.1 92.6 -2.5 97.2 1221No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.2 90.7 -3.5 96.0 1510Declined
Lowest Performing 83.6 69.4 -14.2 87.7 360Declined
High needs 87.5 78.0 -9.5 90.1 590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.7 82.8 -6.9 92.0 320Declined
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities 81.8 72.7 -9.1 85.0 320Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.1 95.0 -1.1 97.9 1191No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.3 50.0 1363Met Target
Lowest Performing 42.8 50.0 262Below Target
High needs 45.9 50.0 472Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.6 50.0 282Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 49.9 50.0 282Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.9 50.0 1133Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 39.4 50.0 1371Below Target
Lowest Performing 24.2 50.0 280Below Target
High needs 33.9 50.0 481Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.2 50.0 301Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 33.7 50.0 271Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 4--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 40.0 50.0 1132Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 92.3 92.7 0.4 94.3 1792Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 88.7 91.9 3.2 92.5 862Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.2 89.1 0.9 92.0 552Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 89.6 95.5 5.9 94.8 444Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.4 95.4 1.0 96.8 1513Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 95.9 0.7 97.2 1693Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.4 94.8 4.4 93.5 974Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.7 92.6 3.9 91.9 684Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 92.0 95.8 3.8 96.3 483Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 7--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.7 97.6 1.9 97.7 1263Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.1 6574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.8 1.2 0.6 1.6 2444Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.9 1.6 0.3 1.7 1283Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 41--
Students w/ disabilities 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.0 1223Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 12--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 22--
Hispanic/Latino---- 67--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 1.0 0.6 0.4 1.0 5174Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.0 48.9 -7.1 38.8 453Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 45--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 16.3 23.8 -7.5 14.4 6560Declined
Lowest Performing 25.0 27.8 -2.8 19.5 360Declined
High needs 25.1 33.0 -7.9 22.5 2910Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.5 36.5 -9.0 23.8 1370Declined
EL and Former EL---- 92--
Students w/ disabilities 21.4 26.7 -5.3 17.7 1160Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 14--
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 24--
Hispanic/Latino---- 95--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 28--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 13.3 20.9 -7.6 11.3 4840Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 58.4 60.3 1.9 64.5 2972Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 32.1 38.5 6.4 40.1 1172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.5 43.9 9.4 44.8 663Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities 27.8 26.5 -1.3 33.2 490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 8--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 32--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 63.1 64.8 1.7 69.5 2302Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 166 16599Yes 1 165 16499Yes 1 165 16499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 71 7099Yes 1 70 6999Yes 1 70 6999Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 41 4098Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1 41 4098Yes 1
EL and Former EL 19---- 19---- 19----
Students w/ disabilities 35 3497Yes 1 34 3397Yes 1 34 3397Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 128 12799Yes 1 127 12699Yes 1 127 12699Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles