Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Minnechaug Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Minnechaug Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Hampden-Wilbraham (06800000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Minnechaug Regional High (06800505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement34-34-
Achievement total101247.591267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.54822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-24-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total3810.02410.0
Weighted total8.210.7-7.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 77%-70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage74%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total121247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate04-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total31220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total1810.0
Weighted total7.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 73%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage73%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.6 99.3 0.7 100.0 2614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.4 97.7 1.3 98.2 664Exceeded Target
High needs 93.8 97.5 3.7 95.8 694Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.5 97.5 3.0 96.9 404Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 91.7 95.0 3.3 94.2 353Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.7 99.3 0.6 100.0 2204Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.7 95.2 0.5 96.4 2613Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.9 83.3 1.4 84.7 662Improved Below Target
High needs 84.1 87.7 3.6 86.2 694Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.8 91.3 1.5 92.9 402Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 79.1 79.3 0.2 82.1 352Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 95.2 0.3 96.5 2202Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.8 92.5 1.7 92.5 2553Met Target
Lowest Performing 75.3 79.9 4.6 79.6 663Met Target
High needs 80.4 84.5 4.1 83.2 664Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.8 85.5 0.7 87.7 382Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 75.6 77.9 2.3 78.6 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.6 92.7 1.1 93.4 2173Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.3 50.0 2403Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.4 50.0 602Below Target
High needs 50.7 50.0 643Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.7 50.0 353Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 51.5 50.0 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.2 50.0 2063Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.1 50.0 2413Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.7 50.0 602Below Target
High needs 55.0 50.0 643Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.7 50.0 353Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 59.6 50.0 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.8 50.0 2073Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 97.2 2.3 97.2 2853Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.0 91.1 4.1 91.1 903Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 82.4 88.5 6.1 87.5 614Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 81.0 88.9 7.9 87.5 454Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 0--
White 95.5 97.6 2.1 97.6 2553Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 96.2 -0.9 98.8 2933Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.7 92.2 -2.5 98.7 770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.8 88.3 -5.5 98.1 510Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 96.0 88.1 -7.9 100.0 420Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 97.2 0.2 98.8 2473Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.5 0.7 -0.2 1.0 1,1453Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.9 2.0 -1.1 1.0 2450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.0 3.1 -2.1 1.0 1310Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 1.3 2.6 -1.3 1.2 1540Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 34--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 31--
Hispanic/Latino---- 60--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 25--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.4 0.5 -0.1 1.0 9923Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 8.8 7.7 1.1 7.7 1,1143Met Target
Lowest Performing 12.5 12.1 0.4 5.9 662Improved Below Target
High needs 18.3 18.8 -0.5 15.9 2771No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.3 19.4 3.9 18.7 1342Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 17.0 21.6 -4.6 13.9 1530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 37--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 27--
Hispanic/Latino---- 60--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 32--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 8.6 7.5 1.1 7.4 9543Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.9 69.8 -2.1 77.6 5760Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 29.9 27.8 -2.1 38.4 1260Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.3 43.9 5.6 48.7 662Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 16.1 7.5 -8.6 23.4 800Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 33--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 73.7 71.2 -2.5 79.0 5030Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 266 265100Yes 1 266 265100Yes 1 265 264100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 72 72100Yes 1 72 72100Yes 1 71 71100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 43 43100Yes 1 43 43100Yes 1 42 42100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 3---- 3---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 16---- 16---- 16----
Afr. Amer./Black 6---- 6---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 12---- 12---- 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 223 222100Yes 1 223 222100Yes 1 223 222100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles