Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Craneville
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Craneville
Organization Information
District:Central Berkshire (06350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Craneville (06350025)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 75.9, Target = 91.5CPI = 75.9, Target = 91.5 85.5 83.4 75.9 -7.5 91.5 92.8 182140Declined
High needsCPI = 67.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 67.4, Target = 85.4 75.0 75.8 67.4 -8.4 85.4 87.5 17960Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.1, Target = 79.8CPI = 69.1, Target = 79.8CPI = 69.1, Target = 79.8 78.0 78.0 69.1 -8.9 79.8 89.0 21800Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.1, Target = 80.5CPI = 58.1, Target = 80.5CPI = 58.1, Target = 80.5 66.5 58.6 58.1 -0.5 80.5 83.3 313425No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.1, Target = 91.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 91.5CPI = 77.1, Target = 91.5 85.4 83.6 77.1 -6.5 91.5 92.7 81980Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.1, Target = 89CPI = 79.1, Target = 89CPI = 79.1, Target = 89 81.2 80.8 79.1 -1.7 89.0 90.6 2421425No Change
High needsCPI = 70.1, Target = 84.1CPI = 70.1, Target = 84.1CPI = 70.1, Target = 84.1 72.8 74.0 70.1 -3.9 84.1 86.4 26960Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.9, Target = 78.5CPI = 71.9, Target = 78.5CPI = 71.9, Target = 78.5 76.5 76.5 71.9 -4.6 78.5 88.3 32800Declined
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 57.4, Target = 77.6CPI = 57.4, Target = 77.6CPI = 57.4, Target = 77.6 61.6 52.6 57.4 4.8 77.6 80.8 293450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 80.2, Target = 89.6CPI = 80.2, Target = 89.6 82.2 81.7 80.2 -1.5 89.6 91.1 1619825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.2, Target = 89.7CPI = 72.2, Target = 89.7CPI = 72.2, Target = 89.7 82.3 76.5 72.2 -4.3 89.7 91.2 27630Declined
High needsCPI = 63.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 63.4, Target = 83.8CPI = 63.4, Target = 83.8 72.2 68.2 63.4 -4.8 83.8 86.1 36280Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.4, Target = 73.2CPI = 64.4, Target = 73.2CPI = 64.4, Target = 73.2 70.8 70.8 64.4 -6.4 73.2 85.4 48260Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 72.1, Target = 90.3CPI = 72.1, Target = 90.3CPI = 72.1, Target = 90.3 83.3 77.7 72.1 -5.6 90.3 91.7 12600Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.3 4.72140 6.1 11.72140
High needs 5.2 0.0960 10.3 16.7960
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.1 0.0800 8.5 17.5800
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 0.0340 27.6 26.5340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.5 4.51980 6.5 10.61980
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.9 25.721425 8.3 13.12140
High needs 11.1 12.59625 11.1 18.8960
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.1 15.08025 9.5 18.8800
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 3.4 2.9340 34.5 35.3340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.5 25.31980 7.4 11.61980
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.9 6.36325 13.4 15.9630
High needs 0.0 0.0280 24.2 21.42825
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0260 20.0 23.1260
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.3 5.0600 12.0 15.0600
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51SGP = 31, Target = 51 49.0 31.0 -18.0 51.0No14225Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 42.0 32.0 -10.0 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51SGP = 30, Target = 51 42.0 30.0 -12.0 51.0No520Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 49.0 32.0 -17.0 51.0No13525Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 63.0 47.0 -16.0 51.0No14350Below Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 60.0 40.0 -20.0 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51SGP = 38.5, Target = 51 58.0 38.5 -19.5 51.0No5225Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 64.5 47.5 -17.0 51.0No13650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students22021899Yes22021899Yes6464100Yes
High needs1009999Yes1009999Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged848399Yes848399Yes2626100Yes
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities363597Yes363597Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White20320199Yes20320199Yes6161100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles