Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Boston Day and Evening Academy Charter School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Boston Day and Evening Academy Charter School
Organization Information
District:Boston Day and Evening Academy Charter (District) (04240000)School type:High School
School:Boston Day and Evening Academy Charter School (04240505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.9, Target = 93.6CPI = 93.9, Target = 93.6 89.0 96.2 93.9 -2.3 93.6 94.5 163375On Target
High needs -------23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------18--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 70.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 70.2, Target = 85.4CPI = 70.2, Target = 85.4 75.0 78.7 70.2 -8.5 85.4 87.5 5310Declined
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------16--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------3--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students  42.0---- 71.0-25--
High needs -------20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------1--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.1 15.2330 0.0 0.03325
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--18---18-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.5 6.5310 14.8 12.93125
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--16---16-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--3---3-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--25---25-
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--7---7-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--1---1-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-2--
High needs --- 51.0-1--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-1--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-2--
High needs --- 51.0-1--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-1--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 9.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 9.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 9.2, Target = 80 16.5 9.2 -7.3 80.0 90.01410Declined
High needs --- 80.0 90.0121--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.023--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.041--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.062--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.057--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.02--
White --- 80.0 90.014--
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 31.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 31.6, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 31.6, Target = 85 28.1 31.6 3.5 85.0 95.015850Improved Below Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.0158--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.016--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.034--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.02--
Asian --- 85.0 95.05--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.072--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.057--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.02--
White --- 85.0 95.017--
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 21.1, Target = 24 41.2 19.8 21.1 -1.3 24.0 20.6738075On Target
High needs -------252--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------195--
EL and Former EL -------35--
Students w/ disabilities -------80--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------199--
Hispanic/Latino -------130--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------2--
White -------32--
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students1125
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students393385No383188No383797Yes
High needs28---27---27---
Econ. Disadvantaged24---24---24---
EL and Former EL4---4---4---
Students w/ disabilities10---9---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black20---19---19---
Hispanic/Latino14---14---14---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3---3---3---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles