Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Vinson-Owen Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Vinson-Owen Elementary

Organization Information
District:Winchester (03440000)School type:Elementary School
School:Vinson-Owen Elementary (03440025)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.3, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 97.1CPI = 95.3, Target = 97.1 95.1 94.5 95.3 0.8 97.1 97.6 95233100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.4CPI = 85.5, Target = 92.4 86.9 85.6 85.5 -0.1 92.4 93.5 886425No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 79.5, Target = 90.1CPI = 79.5, Target = 90.1 83.1 81.9 79.5 -2.4 90.1 91.6 873925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 96.9, Target = 99.4CPI = 96.9, Target = 99.4CPI = 96.9, Target = 99.4 99.0 94.1 96.9 2.8 99.4 99.5 8148100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.7, Target = 96.8CPI = 94.7, Target = 96.8CPI = 94.7, Target = 96.8 94.5 94.4 94.7 0.3 96.8 97.3 89159100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.2, Target = 97.3CPI = 96.2, Target = 97.3CPI = 96.2, Target = 97.3 95.3 94.0 96.2 2.2 97.3 97.7 97232100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 88.9, Target = 94.2CPI = 88.9, Target = 94.2 90.0 79.2 88.9 9.7 94.2 95.0 956375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------21--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81.6, Target = 93.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 93.4CPI = 81.6, Target = 93.4 88.7 72.2 81.6 9.4 93.4 94.4 913875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
AsianCPI = 97.9, Target = 97.7CPI = 97.9, Target = 97.7 96.0 94.9 97.9 3.0 97.7 98.0 7348100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.9, Target = 97CPI = 95.9, Target = 97CPI = 95.9, Target = 97 94.9 94.6 95.9 1.3 97.0 97.5 94159100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.1, Target = 94.4CPI = 95.1, Target = 94.4 90.4 95.6 95.1 -0.5 94.4 95.2 9782100Above Target
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 93.9CPI = 93.8, Target = 93.9 89.6 95.6 93.8 -1.8 93.9 94.8 9156100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 47.7 41.22330 0.9 0.92330
High needs 16.7 21.96425 3.7 3.16425
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 7.73925 2.8 5.1390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 61.8 50.0480 2.9 2.14825
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--17---17-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 45.1 39.01590 0.6 0.61590
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 58.6 65.523225 2.7 1.723225
High needs 29.6 38.16325 11.1 6.36325
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--21---21-
Students w/ disabilities 13.9 15.83825 13.9 10.53825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian 73.5 79.2480 5.9 2.14825
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--16---16-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 56.2 63.515925 1.9 1.91590
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 44.1 52.48225 2.9 2.48225
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.3 50.05625 2.0 3.6560
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 69.0 69.5 0.5 51.0No150100Above Target
High needsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 69.0 61.0 -8.0 51.0No37100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-28--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 68.5 65.5 -3.0 51.0No108100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51 69.0 82.0 13.0 51.0Yes150100Above Target
High needsSGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51SGP = 79, Target = 51 64.5 79.0 14.5 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 58.5 65.0 6.5 51.0Yes26100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-28--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51SGP = 82, Target = 51 71.0 82.0 11.0 51.0Yes109100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011-
High needs- 60.011-
EL and Former EL- 60.011-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students235234100Yes236236100Yes8484100Yes
High needs656498Yes6565100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged14---14---4---
EL and Former EL21---21---3---
Students w/ disabilities403998Yes4040100Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian4848100Yes4848100Yes16---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1---1---
Hispanic/Latino7---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.18---17---6---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16015999Yes161161100Yes5858100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles