Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Intermediate
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Intermediate
Organization Information
District:Wilmington (03420000)School type:Elementary School
School:North Intermediate (03420060)Grades served:04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 90.5, Target = 94.5CPI = 90.5, Target = 94.5 90.5 93.7 90.5 -3.2 94.5 95.3 732780Declined
High needsCPI = 75.4, Target = 83.4CPI = 75.4, Target = 83.4CPI = 75.4, Target = 83.4 71.6 82.1 75.4 -6.7 83.4 85.8 47640Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.4, Target = 75.8CPI = 71.4, Target = 75.8CPI = 71.4, Target = 75.8 58.5 78.1 71.4 -6.7 75.8 79.3 68490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 91.1, Target = 94.3CPI = 91.1, Target = 94.3 90.3 94.3 91.1 -3.2 94.3 95.2 672470Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.6, Target = 92.6CPI = 91.6, Target = 92.6 87.3 88.1 91.6 3.5 92.6 93.7 7827875On Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 82.1CPI = 82, Target = 82.1 69.3 70.8 82.0 11.2 82.1 84.7 756475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.6, Target = 75.1CPI = 78.6, Target = 75.1CPI = 78.6, Target = 75.1 57.3 65.8 78.6 12.8 75.1 78.7 8549100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.6, Target = 92.9 87.9 88.0 91.6 3.6 92.9 94.0 7324750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.9, Target = 90CPI = 76.9, Target = 90CPI = 76.9, Target = 90 82.9 76.8 76.9 0.1 90.0 91.5 3814350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.7, Target = 80CPI = 66.7, Target = 80CPI = 66.7, Target = 80 65.7 66.1 66.7 0.6 80.0 82.9 463050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------3--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.7, Target = 74.2CPI = 65.7, Target = 74.2CPI = 65.7, Target = 74.2 55.8 60.8 65.7 4.9 74.2 77.9 642750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 76.6, Target = 90.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 90.2CPI = 76.6, Target = 90.2 83.2 76.8 76.6 -0.2 90.2 91.6 1912825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.2 18.72780 0.9 4.02780
High needs 11.7 9.4640 3.9 14.1640
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 5.3 4.1490 5.3 16.3490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.2 17.42470 0.4 3.22470
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.0 42.427825 2.8 0.427825
High needs 15.6 17.26425 11.7 0.06425
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 8.8 14.34925 15.8 0.04925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--14---14-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.3 43.324725 2.8 0.424725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.1 11.214325 6.8 4.914325
High needs 6.7 13.33025 6.7 13.3300
Econ. Disadvantaged--3---3-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 14.82725 6.7 11.1270
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.6 10.912825 7.0 3.912825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 58.0 52.0 -6.0 51.0No27475On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 51.5 50.5 -1.0 51.0No6275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 50.0 50.0 0.0 51.0No4850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 58.0 53.0 -5.0 51.0No24575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51SGP = 70, Target = 51 62.0 70.0 8.0 51.0Yes276100Above Target
High needsSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 58.5 73.0 14.5 51.0Yes63100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51SGP = 73, Target = 51 57.0 73.0 16.0 51.0Yes48100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 60.5 69.5 9.0 51.0Yes246100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students279279100Yes279279100Yes144144100Yes
High needs6464100Yes6464100Yes3030100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged19---19---3---
EL and Former EL7---7---3---
Students w/ disabilities4949100Yes4949100Yes2727100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---5---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.14---14---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White248248100Yes248248100Yes129129100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles