Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas MacArthur Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Douglas MacArthur Elementary School

Organization Information
District:Waltham (03080000)School type:Elementary School
School:Douglas MacArthur Elementary School (03080032)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 83.8, Target = 90.1 83.1 80.8 83.8 3.0 90.1 91.6 4115350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69.1, Target = 81CPI = 69.1, Target = 81CPI = 69.1, Target = 81 67.4 66.2 69.1 2.9 81.0 83.7 226450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.3, Target = 71.6CPI = 70.3, Target = 71.6CPI = 70.3, Target = 71.6 69.0 69.0 70.3 1.3 71.6 84.5 233750Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL  52.1---- 76.1-26--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 52.1, Target = 73.9CPI = 52.1, Target = 73.9CPI = 52.1, Target = 73.9 55.3 45.8 52.1 6.3 73.9 77.7 183650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 72.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.3 78.2 66.4 72.9 6.5 87.3 89.1 533650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 87.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 87.4, Target = 90.8 84.2 86.2 87.4 1.2 90.8 92.1 478550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.6, Target = 88.1CPI = 78.6, Target = 88.1CPI = 78.6, Target = 88.1 79.6 79.7 78.6 -1.1 88.1 89.8 2315325No Change
High needsCPI = 58.6, Target = 79.5CPI = 58.6, Target = 79.5CPI = 58.6, Target = 79.5 64.9 64.2 58.6 -5.6 79.5 82.5 4640Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 61.5, Target = 72.1CPI = 61.5, Target = 72.1CPI = 61.5, Target = 72.1 69.6 69.6 61.5 -8.1 72.1 84.8 6370Declined
EL and Former EL  66.7---- 83.4-26--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 38.2, Target = 74.6CPI = 38.2, Target = 74.6CPI = 38.2, Target = 74.6 56.4 49.3 38.2 -11.1 74.6 78.2 3360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 63.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 63.2, Target = 83.6CPI = 63.2, Target = 83.6 71.8 65.1 63.2 -1.9 83.6 85.9 163625No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.5, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.5, Target = 89.7 82.3 86.0 83.5 -2.5 89.7 91.2 278525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.9, Target = 86.8CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.8CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.8 77.3 83.2 79.9 -3.3 86.8 88.7 47510Declined
High needs  59.5---- 79.8-22--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86, Target = 88.9CPI = 86, Target = 88.9CPI = 86, Target = 88.9 80.9 89.4 86.0 -3.4 88.9 90.5 55250Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.2 13.71530 11.2 8.515325
High needs 9.2 7.8640 24.6 18.86425
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.3 10.8370 23.8 21.6370
EL and Former EL--26---26-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 44.4 33.33625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 5.3 8.33625 23.7 16.73625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.4 15.3850 7.1 4.78525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 27.2 34.015325 12.4 17.01530
High needs 15.4 14.1640 27.7 35.9640
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 18.93725 26.2 37.8370
EL and Former EL--26---26-
Students w/ disabilities 2.8 0.0360 44.4 55.6360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 10.5 13.93625 34.2 30.63625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 33.7 41.28525 3.1 11.8850
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.6 15.7510 8.2 9.8510
High needs--22---22-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.5 20.0250 2.5 4.0250
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 60.0 65.0 5.0 51.0Yes100100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 60.0 60.0 0.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 63.0 66.5 3.5 51.0No52100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 44.5 69.0 24.5 51.0No100100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 28.5 48.0 19.5 51.0No39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-16--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-26--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51SGP = 71.5, Target = 51 45.5 71.5 26.0 51.0No52100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.016-
High needs- 60.016-
EL and Former EL- 60.016-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students160160100Yes160160100Yes5353100Yes
High needs7171100Yes7171100Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4141100Yes4141100Yes14---
EL and Former EL3131100Yes3131100Yes10---
Students w/ disabilities3636100Yes3636100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian13---13---7---
Afr. Amer./Black17---17---5---
Hispanic/Latino3838100Yes3838100Yes14---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8686100Yes8686100Yes2525100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles