Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mary A. Dryden Veterans Memorial School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mary A. Dryden Veterans Memorial School
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mary A. Dryden Veterans Memorial School (02810125)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Insufficient data
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.5, Target = 71.7CPI = 72.5, Target = 71.7 66.0 59.3 72.5 13.2 71.7 83.0 1212275On Target
High needsCPI = 69.3, Target = 69.5CPI = 69.3, Target = 69.5 63.4 53.7 69.3 15.6 69.5 81.7 228475On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.8, Target = 58CPI = 69.8, Target = 58CPI = 69.8, Target = 58 54.2 54.2 69.8 15.6 58.0 77.1 2277100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------24--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 66.7, Target = 71.3CPI = 66.7, Target = 71.3CPI = 66.7, Target = 71.3 65.6 52.6 66.7 14.1 71.3 82.8 256350Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.6, Target = 78.3CPI = 78.6, Target = 78.3 74.0 77.7 78.6 0.9 78.3 87.0 112875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 69.8, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.8, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.8, Target = 81.3 77.6 65.0 69.8 4.8 81.3 88.8 812050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 64.6, Target = 79.2CPI = 64.6, Target = 79.2CPI = 64.6, Target = 79.2 75.0 61.7 64.6 2.9 79.2 87.5 128250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 64.7, Target = 65.6CPI = 64.7, Target = 65.6 62.5 62.5 64.7 2.2 65.6 81.3 117575On Target
EL and Former EL -------23--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------23--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 63.1, Target = 80.8CPI = 63.1, Target = 80.8CPI = 63.1, Target = 80.8 76.9 57.2 63.1 5.9 80.8 88.5 166150Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.3, Target = 87.2CPI = 81.3, Target = 87.2CPI = 81.3, Target = 87.2 84.6 77.8 81.3 3.5 87.2 92.3 192850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 47.3, Target = 67.8CPI = 47.3, Target = 67.8CPI = 47.3, Target = 67.8 61.4 69.0 47.3 -21.7 67.8 80.7 4370Declined
High needsCPI = 48.4, Target = 63.9CPI = 48.4, Target = 63.9CPI = 48.4, Target = 63.9 56.7 66.9 48.4 -18.5 63.9 78.4 9320Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 49.1, Target = 69.5CPI = 49.1, Target = 69.5CPI = 49.1, Target = 69.5 66.7 66.7 49.1 -17.6 69.5 83.4 16290Declined
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/Latino -------19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------6--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.6 3.312225 32.5 14.812225
High needs 1.1 1.2840 39.4 17.98425
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.1 1.37725 38.9 16.97725
EL and Former EL--24---24-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 4.86325 38.2 17.56325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.6 3.6280 14.3 10.72825
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.3 15.812025 23.6 20.812025
High needs 4.3 11.08225 23.9 24.4820
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.5 8.07525 22.7 22.7750
EL and Former EL--23---23-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--23---23-
Hispanic/Latino 3.0 8.26125 27.3 26.2610
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.1 28.62825 14.8 10.72825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.1 2.7370 19.0 43.2370
High needs 2.9 0.0320 20.6 40.6320
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.0 0.0290 21.2 37.9290
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--4---4-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino--19---19-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--6---6-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 23.0 58.0 35.0 51.0Yes71100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 17.0 62.0 45.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 17.0 60.0 43.0 51.0Yes48100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 17.0 56.0 39.0 51.0Yes39100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-11--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 14.0 33.0 19.0 51.0Yes68100Above Target
High needsSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 13.0 27.0 14.0 51.0Yes4975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51SGP = 28, Target = 51 12.0 28.0 16.0 51.0No46100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-12--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 13.0 39.0 26.0 51.0Yes37100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-10--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 65.0 60.03325
High needs 65.0 60.03325
EL and Former EL- 60.033-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13313299Yes13313098Yes4040100Yes
High needs9393100Yes939198Yes3535100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged8686100Yes868498Yes3232100Yes
EL and Former EL27---27---10---
Students w/ disabilities13---13---4---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---6---
Afr. Amer./Black24---24---7---
Hispanic/Latino6969100Yes696797Yes20---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White292897Yes292897Yes6---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles