Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Samuel Bowles
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Samuel Bowles
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Samuel Bowles (02810020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 68.5, Target = 83.6CPI = 68.5, Target = 83.6CPI = 68.5, Target = 83.6 71.9 61.8 68.5 6.7 83.6 86.0 713550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 66.2, Target = 82.4CPI = 66.2, Target = 82.4 69.9 58.0 66.2 8.2 82.4 85.0 1310850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 67.6, Target = 62.2CPI = 67.6, Target = 62.2CPI = 67.6, Target = 62.2 58.8 58.8 67.6 8.8 62.2 79.4 1698100Above Target
EL and Former EL  50.0---- 75.0-28--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 67.2, Target = 82.7CPI = 67.2, Target = 82.7CPI = 67.2, Target = 82.7 70.3 58.9 67.2 8.3 82.7 85.2 269650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------21--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67.2, Target = 77.1CPI = 67.2, Target = 77.1CPI = 67.2, Target = 77.1 60.8 67.9 67.2 -0.7 77.1 80.4 613225No Change
High needsCPI = 64, Target = 76.3CPI = 64, Target = 76.3CPI = 64, Target = 76.3 59.3 62.8 64.0 1.2 76.3 79.7 1110750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 66.2, Target = 66.5CPI = 66.2, Target = 66.5 63.4 63.4 66.2 2.8 66.5 81.7 149775On Target
EL and Former EL  34.8---- 67.4-28--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 66.1, Target = 77CPI = 66.1, Target = 77CPI = 66.1, Target = 77 60.5 64.4 66.1 1.7 77.0 80.3 269350Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------21--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 56, Target = 76.4CPI = 56, Target = 76.4CPI = 56, Target = 76.4 59.6 70.3 56.0 -14.3 76.4 79.8 10460Declined
High needsCPI = 54.3, Target = 76.5CPI = 54.3, Target = 76.5CPI = 54.3, Target = 76.5 59.7 66.7 54.3 -12.4 76.5 79.9 17410Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 58.8, Target = 71.6CPI = 58.8, Target = 71.6CPI = 58.8, Target = 71.6 69.0 69.0 58.8 -10.2 71.6 84.5 34340Declined
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 57.8, Target = 73.2CPI = 57.8, Target = 73.2CPI = 57.8, Target = 73.2 54.0 69.4 57.8 -11.6 73.2 77.0 45320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------11--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.713525 23.7 18.513525
High needs 0.0 0.910825 28.6 19.410825
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.09825 28.2 17.39825
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 1.09625 24.7 20.89625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--21---21-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.3 12.913225 22.1 22.71320
High needs 4.4 12.110725 27.8 27.11070
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.8 13.49725 27.4 24.7970
EL and Former EL--28---28-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 2.7 14.09325 28.8 21.59325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--21---21-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 4.34625 13.5 28.3460
High needs 0.0 4.94125 16.7 31.7410
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 5.93425 13.8 26.5340
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0320 14.8 21.9320
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--11---11-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 18.5 60.0 41.5 51.0Yes76100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 18.5 60.0 41.5 51.0Yes61100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 17.5 60.0 42.5 51.0Yes54100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 20.5 60.0 39.5 51.0Yes51100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0-15--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 18.5 36.0 17.5 51.0No73100Above Target
High needsSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 18.0 34.5 16.5 51.0No60100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 17.0 38.0 21.0 51.0No53100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-14--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 18.0 35.0 17.0 51.0No48100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
White --- 51.0-15--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 78.0 60.03125
High needs 78.0 60.03125
EL and Former EL 78.0 60.031-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students152152100Yes15214998Yes4949100Yes
High needs122122100Yes12212199Yes4343100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged110110100Yes11010999Yes3636100Yes
EL and Former EL3232100Yes3232100Yes9---
Students w/ disabilities19---19---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black19---19---5---
Hispanic/Latino105105100Yes10510297Yes3333100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White23---23---11---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles