Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Thomas M Balliet
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Thomas M Balliet
Organization Information
District:Springfield (02810000)School type:Elementary School
School:Thomas M Balliet (02810015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67.5, Target = 81.3CPI = 67.5, Target = 81.3CPI = 67.5, Target = 81.3 68.0 61.7 67.5 5.8 81.3 84.0 611350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3CPI = 66.1, Target = 80.3 66.3 60.5 66.1 5.6 80.3 83.2 137950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.2, Target = 65.6CPI = 68.2, Target = 65.6CPI = 68.2, Target = 65.6 62.5 62.5 68.2 5.7 65.6 81.3 1870100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 65.9, Target = 83.8CPI = 65.9, Target = 83.8CPI = 65.9, Target = 83.8 72.3 65.8 65.9 0.1 83.8 86.2 214150Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 66.7, Target = 79.5CPI = 66.7, Target = 79.5CPI = 66.7, Target = 79.5 64.9 56.9 66.7 9.8 79.5 82.5 256350Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67.7, Target = 75CPI = 67.7, Target = 75CPI = 67.7, Target = 75 57.1 66.3 67.7 1.4 75.0 78.6 611350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.8, Target = 74.5CPI = 65.8, Target = 74.5CPI = 65.8, Target = 74.5 56.2 64.5 65.8 1.3 74.5 78.1 147950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.6, Target = 68.9CPI = 68.6, Target = 68.9 66.1 66.1 68.6 2.5 68.9 83.1 217075On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 64, Target = 73.9CPI = 64, Target = 73.9CPI = 64, Target = 73.9 55.3 63.3 64.0 0.7 73.9 77.7 184150Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 67.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 67.9, Target = 73.1CPI = 67.9, Target = 73.1 53.8 65.1 67.9 2.8 73.1 76.9 316350Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 52.6, Target = 77.4CPI = 52.6, Target = 77.4CPI = 52.6, Target = 77.4 61.2 66.1 52.6 -13.5 77.4 80.6 7290Declined
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------13--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------2--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.6 2.711325 25.4 15.011325
High needs 0.0 2.57925 25.3 17.77925
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 2.97025 23.7 15.77025
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black 3.3 4.94125 13.3 12.2410
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.0630 32.5 17.56325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.3 7.11130 27.0 23.011325
High needs 7.2 6.3790 28.9 25.37925
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.6 7.1700 27.6 21.47025
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black 10.0 7.3410 30.0 24.44125
Hispanic/Latino 8.4 6.3630 27.7 23.86325
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.2 3.42925 15.6 31.0290
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--13---13-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--2---2-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 30.0 61.0 31.0 51.0No69100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 38.5 65.5 27.0 51.0No46100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 35.5 65.5 30.0 51.0No40100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-26--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 33.0 68.0 35.0 51.0No41100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 57.0 49.0 -8.0 51.0No6950Below Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 59.0 41.0 -18.0 51.0No4650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 59.0 45.0 -14.0 51.0No4050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-26--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 59.0 51.0 -8.0 51.0No4175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-2--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students125125100Yes125125100Yes3434100Yes
High needs9191100Yes9191100Yes24---
Econ. Disadvantaged8181100Yes8181100Yes22---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities20---20---5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black4545100Yes4545100Yes14---
Hispanic/Latino7070100Yes7070100Yes18---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8---8---2---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles