Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Staff Sargent James J. Hill Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Staff Sargent James J. Hill Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Revere (02480000)School type:Elementary School
School:Staff Sargent James J. Hill Elementary School (02480035)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.7, Target = 85.6CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.6CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.6 75.3 81.6 82.7 1.1 85.6 87.7 3629350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.9, Target = 84.8CPI = 76.9, Target = 84.8CPI = 76.9, Target = 84.8 74.0 77.1 76.9 -0.2 84.8 87.0 5519325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.4, Target = 83.1CPI = 81.4, Target = 83.1CPI = 81.4, Target = 83.1 81.6 81.6 81.4 -0.2 83.1 90.8 7213225No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 72.9, Target = 83.9CPI = 72.9, Target = 83.9CPI = 72.9, Target = 83.9 72.4 70.3 72.9 2.6 83.9 86.2 589450Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.9, Target = 71.4CPI = 54.9, Target = 71.4CPI = 54.9, Target = 71.4 50.9 51.9 54.9 3.0 71.4 75.5 254650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 81.4, Target = 84.5CPI = 81.4, Target = 84.5CPI = 81.4, Target = 84.5 73.5 79.5 81.4 1.9 84.5 86.8 8416950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 87.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.3 78.2 83.7 83.1 -0.6 87.3 89.1 239025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 86.8CPI = 87.7, Target = 86.8 77.4 88.0 87.7 -0.3 86.8 88.7 6029375On Target
High needsCPI = 83.9, Target = 85.9CPI = 83.9, Target = 85.9CPI = 83.9, Target = 85.9 75.8 85.0 83.9 -1.1 85.9 87.9 8219325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.7, Target = 88.6CPI = 87.7, Target = 88.6 87.6 87.6 87.7 0.1 88.6 93.8 9213275On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 81.4, Target = 85.7CPI = 81.4, Target = 85.7CPI = 81.4, Target = 85.7 75.4 81.6 81.4 -0.2 85.7 87.7 739425No Change
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.9, Target = 69.3CPI = 54.9, Target = 69.3CPI = 54.9, Target = 69.3 47.3 59.6 54.9 -4.7 69.3 73.7 22460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------15--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 86.7, Target = 86.2CPI = 86.7, Target = 86.2 76.3 88.5 86.7 -1.8 86.2 88.2 9116975On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 89.1CPI = 90.3, Target = 89.1CPI = 90.3, Target = 89.1 81.3 87.2 90.3 3.1 89.1 90.7 649075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.4, Target = 88CPI = 78.4, Target = 88CPI = 78.4, Target = 88 79.5 87.3 78.4 -8.9 88.0 89.8 411030Declined
High needsCPI = 72.9, Target = 87.5CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.5CPI = 72.9, Target = 87.5 78.6 82.3 72.9 -9.4 87.5 89.3 68730Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 76.7, Target = 87.4CPI = 76.7, Target = 87.4 86.3 86.3 76.7 -9.6 87.4 93.2 84430Declined
EL and Former EL  69.0---- 84.5-30--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.4, Target = 86.8CPI = 75.4, Target = 86.8 77.3 84.0 75.4 -8.6 86.8 88.7 83620Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  83.7---- 91.9-31--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.5 9.929325 6.8 8.22930
High needs 1.9 4.119325 9.6 10.91930
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.7 3.813225 6.2 7.61320
EL and Former EL 0.0 2.19425 15.6 16.0940
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.24625 34.6 32.6460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 3.1 8.916925 10.2 8.316925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.4 8.99025 3.8 7.8900
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.9 35.52930 3.8 5.82930
High needs 25.5 27.51930 5.7 8.31930
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.9 31.81320 5.3 6.11320
EL and Former EL 18.8 22.39425 6.3 10.6940
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 0.0460 30.8 28.3460
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--15---15-
Hispanic/Latino 35.2 30.81690 4.7 7.11690
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.8 36.79025 1.3 2.2900
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.7 14.61030 4.1 10.71030
High needs 19.5 9.6730 7.3 15.1730
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.8 14.0430 3.2 9.3430
EL and Former EL--30---30-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino 20.5 17.7620 7.7 16.1620
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--31---31-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-172--
High needs --- 51.0-112--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-76--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-49--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-99--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-56--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0-174--
High needs --- 51.0-114--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-78--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-50--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-99--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-56--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 88.0 60.011725
High needs 88.0 60.011725
EL and Former EL 88.0 60.011725
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students317317100Yes317317100Yes109109100Yes
High needs217217100Yes217217100Yes7979100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged144144100Yes144144100Yes4646100Yes
EL and Former EL108108100Yes108108100Yes3333100Yes
Students w/ disabilities5454100Yes5454100Yes24---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black18---18---7---
Hispanic/Latino185185100Yes185185100Yes6565100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9595100Yes9595100Yes3232100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles