Massachusetts School and District Profiles

R. K. Finn Ryan Road
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - R. K. Finn Ryan Road
Organization Information
District:Northampton (02100000)School type:Elementary School
School:R. K. Finn Ryan Road (02100029)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.8 87.6 82.1 87.3 5.2 92.8 93.8 5812250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 75.9, Target = 86.6CPI = 75.9, Target = 86.6 77.0 69.0 75.9 6.9 86.6 88.5 515550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.2, Target = 73.2CPI = 72.2, Target = 73.2 70.8 70.8 72.2 1.4 73.2 85.4 283675On Target
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 72.1, Target = 80.6CPI = 72.1, Target = 80.6 66.7 65.0 72.1 7.1 80.6 83.4 703450Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 70.7, Target = 77.3CPI = 70.7, Target = 77.3CPI = 70.7, Target = 77.3 72.8 70.4 70.7 0.3 77.3 86.4 422950Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.2CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.2 90.0 85.4 92.7 7.3 94.2 95.0 778675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.3, Target = 85.3CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.3CPI = 81.3, Target = 85.3 74.8 78.7 81.3 2.6 85.3 87.4 3112350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.4, Target = 76.1CPI = 71.4, Target = 76.1CPI = 71.4, Target = 76.1 59.0 65.5 71.4 5.9 76.1 79.5 305650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.9, Target = 72.6CPI = 68.9, Target = 72.6CPI = 68.9, Target = 72.6 70.1 70.1 68.9 -1.2 72.6 85.1 223725No Change
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 63.6, Target = 66.8CPI = 63.6, Target = 66.8CPI = 63.6, Target = 66.8 43.1 57.5 63.6 6.1 66.8 71.6 473550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 62.9, Target = 75.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 75.6CPI = 62.9, Target = 75.6 70.7 66.7 62.9 -3.8 75.6 85.4 15290Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.1, Target = 88.2CPI = 87.1, Target = 88.2CPI = 87.1, Target = 88.2 79.7 83.1 87.1 4.0 88.2 89.9 448775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 72.6, Target = 84.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 84.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 84.7 73.7 79.2 72.6 -6.6 84.7 86.9 28420Declined
High needs  62.5---- 81.3-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 74.2, Target = 87.8CPI = 74.2, Target = 87.8CPI = 74.2, Target = 87.8 79.1 80.3 74.2 -6.1 87.8 89.6 16300Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.6 16.412225 9.8 4.912225
High needs 3.4 5.55525 19.0 10.95525
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.6 5.6360 16.7 13.93625
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.93425 22.5 11.83425
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino 3.7 6.92925 22.2 13.82925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.0 19.88625 5.6 1.28625
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.3 28.512325 12.2 10.612325
High needs 8.6 19.65625 24.1 23.2560
Econ. Disadvantaged 13.9 16.23725 22.2 24.3370
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 5.0 11.43525 30.0 34.3350
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino 11.1 13.82925 25.9 27.6290
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.3 33.38725 6.7 5.78725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.1 7.1420 7.1 16.7420
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.1 10.03025 6.1 13.3300
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 32.0 42.0 10.0 51.0Yes7375On Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 25.0 40.0 15.0 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 35.5 42.0 6.5 51.0Yes5175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 33.0 44.5 11.5 51.0No7475On Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 31.5 45.5 14.0 51.0Yes3475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 37.0 44.5 7.5 51.0Yes5275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08-
High needs- 60.08-
EL and Former EL- 60.08-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12712699Yes127127100Yes4242100Yes
High needs605998Yes6060100Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged403998Yes4040100Yes12---
EL and Former EL13---13---3---
Students w/ disabilities373697Yes3737100Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino3333100Yes3333100Yes11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White878699Yes8787100Yes3030100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles