Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medfield Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Medfield Senior High

Organization Information
District:Medfield (01750000)School type:High School
School:Medfield Senior High (01750505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.5, Target = 99.8CPI = 99.5, Target = 99.8 99.7 99.7 99.5 -0.2 99.8 99.9 84215100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.6, Target = 98.9CPI = 96.6, Target = 98.9CPI = 96.6, Target = 98.9 98.1 98.1 96.6 -1.5 98.9 99.1 672925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 99.9, Target = 99.8CPI = 99.9, Target = 99.8 99.7 99.9 99.9 0.0 99.8 99.9 93195100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99, Target = 99.7CPI = 99, Target = 99.7 99.4 98.4 99.0 0.6 99.7 99.7 97215100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.2, Target = 97.2CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.2CPI = 92.2, Target = 97.2 95.2 92.9 92.2 -0.7 97.2 97.6 892925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 99.1, Target = 99.6CPI = 99.1, Target = 99.6 99.3 98.7 99.1 0.4 99.6 99.7 97195100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.2, Target = 98.7CPI = 98.2, Target = 98.7 97.8 96.7 98.2 1.5 98.7 98.9 93209100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 90.4, Target = 90.7 84.0 86.3 90.4 4.1 90.7 92.0 842675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 98.7, Target = 98.7CPI = 98.7, Target = 98.7 97.7 96.7 98.7 2.0 98.7 98.9 93192100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 75.0 74.92150 0.0 0.52150
High needs 42.5 34.5290 0.0 3.4290
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 74.9 74.91950 0.0 0.019525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 79.0 84.72150 0.5 0.52150
High needs 46.2 41.4290 2.6 3.4290
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 78.8 85.11950 0.0 0.51950
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 50.7 61.720925 0.0 0.020925
High needs 15.0 19.22625 0.0 0.02625
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 49.7 61.519225 0.0 0.019225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 46.0 49.5 3.5 51.0Yes20275On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 35.0 43.0 8.0 51.0No2650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 46.0 50.0 4.0 51.0No18450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 60.5 66.5 6.0 51.0Yes204100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 69.5 63.0 -6.5 51.0No26100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 60.5 66.0 5.5 51.0Yes186100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80 98.7 100.0 1.3 80.0 90.0198100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80 96.9 100.0 3.1 80.0 90.048100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.035--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.06--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.02--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.04--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 80 98.7 100.0 1.3 80.0 90.0184100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85 99.2 99.1 -0.1 85.0 95.0232100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.024--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.015--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.06--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 99.1, Target = 85 99.1 99.1 0.0 85.0 95.0224100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.2, Target = 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.18487675On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0, Target = 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.591124100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------106--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------34--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.2, Target = 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.17980375On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students219219100Yes219219100Yes219219100Yes
High needs3131100Yes3131100Yes3131100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7---7---7---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities25---25---25---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---9---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White198198100Yes198198100Yes198198100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles