Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Capt William G Shoemaker
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Capt William G Shoemaker
Organization Information
District:Lynn (01630000)School type:Elementary School
School:Capt William G Shoemaker (01630090)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 86.5, Target = 92.9 87.9 88.4 86.5 -1.9 92.9 94.0 5412825No Change
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 79.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 79.1, Target = 90.6 83.8 84.8 79.1 -5.7 90.6 91.9 66670Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 86.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 86.3 85.1 85.1 83.3 -1.8 86.3 92.6 813925No Change
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.1, Target = 89.9CPI = 77.1, Target = 89.9CPI = 77.1, Target = 89.9 82.6 84.8 77.1 -7.7 89.9 91.3 83480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------20--
Hispanic/Latino  88.8---- 94.4-27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.8, Target = 94.4CPI = 88.8, Target = 94.4CPI = 88.8, Target = 94.4 90.4 88.6 88.8 0.2 94.4 95.2 536050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 91.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.2CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.2 84.9 87.0 88.3 1.3 91.2 92.5 6312850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 89CPI = 80.2, Target = 89CPI = 80.2, Target = 89 81.2 86.8 80.2 -6.6 89.0 90.6 69670Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84, Target = 90.7CPI = 84, Target = 90.7CPI = 84, Target = 90.7 89.9 89.9 84.0 -5.9 90.7 95.0 81390Declined
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75, Target = 91.5CPI = 75, Target = 91.5CPI = 75, Target = 91.5 85.4 83.0 75.0 -8.0 91.5 92.7 77480Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------20--
Hispanic/Latino  86.2---- 93.1-27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.9, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.9, Target = 93.1 88.2 87.9 87.9 0.0 93.1 94.1 506025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 88.2CPI = 75, Target = 88.2CPI = 75, Target = 88.2 79.8 82.7 75.0 -7.7 88.2 89.9 34370Declined
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 77.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 77.5, Target = 92.9CPI = 77.5, Target = 92.9 87.9 84.0 77.5 -6.5 92.9 94.0 21200Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.7 10.21280 5.0 3.912825
High needs 3.9 3.0670 7.8 7.5670
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 5.1390 8.1 5.13925
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0480 10.7 8.34825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--20---20-
Hispanic/Latino--27---27-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.9 15.06025 2.9 5.0600
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.5 26.612825 4.1 4.71280
High needs 15.7 13.4670 3.9 9.0670
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.6 17.9390 5.4 7.7390
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.24825 3.6 12.5480
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--20---20-
Hispanic/Latino--27---27-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.4 30.06025 2.9 6.7600
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.7 8.1370 5.8 10.8370
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.6 15.02025 5.6 10.0200
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 43.0 65.0 22.0 51.0No61100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 36.5 48.0 11.5 51.0No2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51 37.5 67.5 30.0 51.0No32100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 42.5 45.0 2.5 51.0No6150Below Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 36.5 32.0 -4.5 51.0No2725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-18--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 42.5 39.5 -3.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students129129100Yes129129100Yes3737100Yes
High needs6868100Yes6868100Yes15---
Econ. Disadvantaged4040100Yes4040100Yes10---
EL and Former EL5---5---1---
Students w/ disabilities4848100Yes4848100Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian11---11---4---
Afr. Amer./Black20---20---5---
Hispanic/Latino2727100Yes2727100Yes7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White6060100Yes6060100Yes2020100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles