Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lenox Memorial High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lenox Memorial High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lenox (01520000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Lenox Memorial High (01520505)
GRADES SERVED
06,07,08,09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
School of Recognition: High Achievement
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
84% - Meeting targets95

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-24-44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-34-34-
Science achievement44----44-44-
Achievement total111267.55867.5111247.5111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-44-44-44-
Mathematics growth34-34-44-34-
Growth total6822.57822.58822.57822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------34----
Extended engagement rate------44----
Annual dropout rate------44----
High school completion total------111220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-14-14-04-
Advanced coursework completion------34----
Additional indicators total4410.01410.04810.00410.0
Weighted total9.210.3-5.17.6-9.610.7-9.010.3-
Percentage of possible points 89%-67%-90%-87%-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan78%
Weight of non-high school results:40%
89%
Weight of high school results:60%
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement------
Mathematics achievement------
Science achievement------
Achievement total------
GrowthEnglish language arts growth------
Mathematics growth------
Growth total------
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism------
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total------
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Percentage of possible points by gradespan--
Criterion-referenced target percentage-
-
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 508.2 509.6 1.4 509.9 1943Met Target
Lowest Performing 485.2 488.2 3.0 489.1 302Improved Below Target
High needs---- 53--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 33--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 509.1 510.5 1.4 510.7 1703Met Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 99.2 -0.8 100.0 614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 98.9 -1.1 100.0 234Exceeded Target
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.1 -0.9 100.0 554Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 504.3 507.8 3.5 505.5 1934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 481.5 483.8 2.3 484.3 303Met Target
High needs---- 52--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 32--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities---- 23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.6 508.8 3.2 506.9 1694Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.1 95.9 1.8 95.6 613Met Target
Lowest Performing 88.0 90.2 2.2 90.0 233Met Target
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.2 95.5 -0.7 97.8 551No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 70.8 76.6 5.8 73.0 634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 74.0 77.2 3.2 76.1 573Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.0 96.7 2.7 95.4 604Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 88.5 92.4 3.9 90.6 234Exceeded Target
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.4 96.3 0.9 96.8 543Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.5 50.0 1763Met Target
Lowest Performing 60.2 50.0 304Exceeded Target
High needs-- 49--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 29--
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities-- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.4 50.0 1543Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 71.6 50.0 574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 60.0 50.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs-- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 12--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 69.8 50.0 514Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 52.1 50.0 1763Met Target
Lowest Performing 54.1 50.0 303Met Target
High needs-- 49--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 29--
EL and Former EL-- 13--
Students w/ disabilities-- 20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.3 50.0 1543Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.7 50.0 574Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 55.7 50.0 213Met Target
High needs-- 13--
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 12--
EL and Former EL-- 1--
Students w/ disabilities-- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 66.2 50.0 514Exceeded Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.6 96.9 -0.7 98.8 643Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 22--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 96.5 -3.5 100.0 573Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 414Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 10--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 9--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 394Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2504Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 62--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2144Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.8 5.5 4.3 8.8 2004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 12.9 13.3 -0.4 9.7 301No Change
High needs---- 51--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 26--
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 9.8 5.7 4.1 8.7 1754Exceeded Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.5 9.8 -0.3 8.5 2461No Change
Lowest Performing 8.3 13.0 -4.7 3.0 230Declined
High needs---- 61--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 13--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 7.9 10.3 -2.4 6.6 2030Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 72.7 76.7 4.0 75.9 1163Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 23--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 72.6 76.8 4.2 75.6 954Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 257 257100Yes 1 257 256100Yes 1 126 12599Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 68 68100Yes 1 68 6799Yes 1 35 3497Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 46 46100Yes 1 46 4598Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1
EL and Former EL 15---- 15---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 28 28100Yes 1 28 28100Yes 1 13----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 10---- 10---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 16---- 16---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 227 227100Yes 1 227 226100Yes 1 114 11399Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles