Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Holliston High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page show video

2016 Accountability Data - Holliston High

Organization Information
District:Holliston (01360000)School type:High School
School:Holliston High (01360505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 99.2, Target = 99.3CPI = 99.2, Target = 99.3 98.8 99.5 99.2 -0.3 99.3 99.4 74188100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96.9, Target = 97.3CPI = 96.9, Target = 97.3 95.3 97.6 96.9 -0.7 97.3 97.7 713275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
ELL and Former ELL ----------
Students w/disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 99.4, Target = 99.5CPI = 99.4, Target = 99.5 99.1 99.7 99.4 -0.3 99.5 99.6 69170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.9, Target = 98.3CPI = 97.9, Target = 98.3 97.0 98.5 97.9 -0.6 98.3 98.5 89189100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 89.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 89.8, Target = 93.5 88.8 92.9 89.8 -3.1 93.5 94.4 81320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
ELL and Former ELL ----------
Students w/disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.9, Target = 98.2CPI = 97.9, Target = 98.2 96.9 98.5 97.9 -0.6 98.2 98.5 82170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 97.5, Target = 98.4CPI = 97.5, Target = 98.4 97.3 98.5 97.5 -1.0 98.4 98.7 87182100Above Target
High needsCPI = 90, Target = 94.1CPI = 90, Target = 94.1CPI = 90, Target = 94.1 89.8 94.0 90.0 -4.0 94.1 94.9 81300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
ELL and Former ELL ----------
Students w/disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 97.4, Target = 98.3CPI = 97.4, Target = 98.3 97.1 98.5 97.4 -1.1 98.3 98.6 8016675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 71.9 72.91880 0.0 0.018825
High needs 29.3 40.63225 0.0 0.03225
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
ELL and Former ELL--------
Students w/disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 71.9 72.91700 0.0 0.017025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 78.7 84.11890 0.0 1.11890
High needs 42.9 56.33225 0.0 6.3320
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
ELL and Former ELL--------
Students w/disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 78.8 85.31700 0.0 1.21700
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 48.0 50.01820 0.0 0.018225
High needs 16.7 23.33025 0.0 0.03025
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
ELL and Former ELL--------
Students w/disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.8 50.61660 0.0 0.016625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 57.0 49.5 -7.5 51.0No18450Below Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 58.0 56.0 -2.0 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
ELL and Former ELL --- 51.0----
Students w/disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 58.0 50.5 -7.5 51.0No16875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 65.0 58.0 -7.0 51.0No18575On Target
High needsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 74.5 54.0 -20.5 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
ELL and Former ELL --- 51.0----
Students w/disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 65.0 57.5 -7.5 51.0No16875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
ELL and Former ELL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 80 99.5 94.4 -5.1 80.0 90.018075On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 85.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 85.2, Target = 80 96.3 85.2 -11.1 80.0 90.05475On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
ELL and Former ELL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/disabilities --- 80.0 90.044--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.09--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.5, Target = 80 99.4 94.5 -4.9 80.0 90.016475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 97.6 100.0 2.4 85.0 95.0191100Above Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 94.5 100.0 5.5 85.0 95.027100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
ELL and Former ELL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/disabilities --- 85.0 95.021--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.07--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 98.0 100.0 2.0 85.0 95.0174100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.4, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 -0.2 0.1 0.17679925No Change
High needsDropout Rate = 1.2, Target = 0.4 0.7 1.3 1.2 0.1 0.4 0.46316825No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------39--
ELL and Former ELL -------5--
Students w/disabilities -------131--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------29--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.3, Target = 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 -0.2 0.1 0.17373375On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2014 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19018999Yes190190100Yes19018999Yes
High needs3333100Yes3333100Yes333297Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged11---11---11---
ELL and Former ELL1---1---1---
Students w/disabilities23---23---23---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---8---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---3---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White170170100Yes170170100Yes17016999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.